Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #408448
| From | "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy, sci.physics, alt.privacy.anon-server, comp.sys.mac.system, alt.comp.os.windows-10, alt.cellular-phone-tech |
| Subject | Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. |
| Date | 2017-04-14 23:48 +0100 |
| Organization | ~ |
| Message-ID | <op.yypiy2egjs98qf@red.lan> (permalink) |
| References | (15 earlier) <140420171535216230%nospam@nospam.invalid> <op.yypck4s1js98qf@red.lan> <140420171635574410%nospam@nospam.invalid> <op.yypd61o7js98qf@red.lan> <ocreg2$92o$1@dont-email.me> |
Cross-posted to 6 groups.
On Fri, 14 Apr 2017 22:21:07 +0100, Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> wrote: > On Fri, 14 Apr 2017 22:05:15 +0100, James Wilkinson Sword, after 15 edits, wrote this: >> On Fri, 14 Apr 2017 21:35:57 +0100, nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> wrote: >> >>> In article <op.yypck4s1js98qf@red.lan>, James Wilkinson Sword >>> <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: >>> >>>> >> Windows 7 is easy to get for free. >>>> > >>>> > not legally it isn't. >>>> >>>> I never said anything about legally. >>> >>> then you're a criminal. >> >> So are half the population in some way or another. Get used to it. > > Thinkof all those people doing side jobs, and not paying income or Social > Security taxes. > All criminals. > Every babysitter would do time. > > Felon: "What are you in for?" > Sitter: "Watching Timmy, bitch!" Now imagine 90% of people in jail (because that's what you'd get). The gullible 10% who play by the rules would have to pay for them. >>>> >> Which used to (and still does?) upgrade to 10 for free. >>>> > >>>> > the free upgrade ended last summer. >>>> >>>> There's a workaround - you pretend you're disabled. Something to do with >>>> activating the ease of access controls. >>> >>> like i said, you're a criminal. >>> >>> do you steal from stores too or just software companies? >> >> Not the same kind of theft. If I copy a piece of software or an mp3, they still have the original. If I steal a TV from a store, they have one less TV. >> >>>> >> Isn't MacOS just linux with another GUI on top? >>>> > >>>> > fuck no. it's way more advanced than that. *way* more. >>>> >>>> It's more fluffy, nice little icons for kids to use. But you can't say >>>> anything is more advanced than linux. >>> >>> linux wishes it was as advanced. >>> >>> modern state of the art software targets mac and windows. not linux. >> >> Because they're more popular, not necessarily better. > > I always figured Windows and Mac had Photoshop because their users were > uglier. Er.... http://i.imgur.com/A7mbk.jpg -- Plan A is always more effective when the device you are working on understands that Plan B involves either a large hammer or a screwdriver.
Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-13 23:42 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-14 18:36 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-14 10:55 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-14 19:03 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-14 11:17 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-14 19:43 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-14 12:17 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-14 20:29 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-14 15:35 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-14 21:33 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-14 16:35 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-14 22:04 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-15 12:10 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-14 12:44 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-14 21:28 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-14 15:57 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-15 00:58 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-14 17:17 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-15 12:10 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 10:20 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-15 13:50 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 11:08 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-15 14:45 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 15:20 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-15 12:10 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-14 15:35 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-14 21:30 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-14 16:35 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-14 22:05 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-14 21:21 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-14 23:48 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-14 17:25 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-15 02:20 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> - 2017-04-15 09:03 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-15 13:51 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-15 12:10 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-14 17:20 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> - 2017-04-14 17:48 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-14 16:01 -0700
csiph-web