Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.sys.mac.system > #104747
| From | "Jonathan N. Little" <lws4art@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy, comp.sys.mac.system, alt.comp.os.windows-10, alt.cellular-phone-tech |
| Subject | Re: Poor "Snit" |
| Date | 2017-04-20 15:41 -0400 |
| Organization | LITTLE WORKS STUDIO |
| Message-ID | <odb2n7$2kr$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <elqhejFcdfdU1@mid.individual.net> <RJ-dneSHn9uGh2XFnZ2dnUU7-W3NnZ2d@giganews.com> <sandman-953bb6cb11d575707a765b01a99daeb8@individual.net> <1PqdnSW4J-lSl2TFnZ2dnUU7-fPNnZ2d@giganews.com> |
Cross-posted to 4 groups.
Marek Novotny wrote:
>
> And now he wants to pass himself off as a Linux advocate. Hilarious. What
> will Michael Glasser ("Snit") think up next...
>
> Maybe Michael Glasser's how to make 100 directories on on Linux is good
> advocating... Except wasn't he just raging on how we did it on Linux and
> showed the Mac way of doing it with the GUI: https://youtu.be/r-Web_U_HeU
>
> I downloaded a copy just in case he doesn't want it shown anymore.
>
> what he called a script is actually a one liner in bash:
>
> for x in {001..100} ; do mkdir folder_$x ; done
>
That is how I would do it, but you could do it in a very similar way in
both Windows and Linux
New Folder > CTRL+C > CTRL+V x 9 > CTRL+A > CTRL+C > CTRL+V x 9
In both Windows and Linux seems to paste those folders faster. Linux
does a better job of giving a more constant naming job on the
duplicates. Windows can do the mass renaming, and I understand the new
Nautilus has that feature without adding an addon script.
--
Take care,
Jonathan
-------------------
LITTLE WORKS STUDIO
http://www.LittleWorksStudio.com
Back to comp.sys.mac.system | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Re: Poor "Snit" Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2017-04-20 14:23 -0500
Re: Poor "Snit" "Jonathan N. Little" <lws4art@gmail.com> - 2017-04-20 15:41 -0400
Re: Poor "Snit" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-20 12:57 -0700
Re: Poor "Snit" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-20 13:01 -0700
Re: Poor "Snit" "Jonathan N. Little" <lws4art@gmail.com> - 2017-04-20 16:06 -0400
Re: Poor "Snit" nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-20 16:20 -0400
Re: Poor "Snit" "Jonathan N. Little" <lws4art@gmail.com> - 2017-04-20 18:32 -0400
Re: Poor "Snit" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-20 15:36 -0700
Re: Poor "Snit" "Jonathan N. Little" <lws4art@gmail.com> - 2017-04-20 21:13 -0400
Re: Poor "Snit" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-20 18:29 -0700
Re: Poor "Snit" nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-20 19:00 -0400
Re: Poor "Snit" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-20 16:17 -0700
Re: Poor "Snit" Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2017-04-21 10:07 +0200
Re: Poor "Snit" chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-21 07:11 -0500
Re: Poor "Snit" nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-21 10:13 -0400
Re: Poor "Snit" Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2017-04-21 16:19 +0200
Re: Poor "Snit" nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-21 10:32 -0400
Re: Poor "Snit" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-21 09:19 -0700
Re: Poor "Snit" nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-21 12:34 -0400
Re: Poor "Snit" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-21 09:38 -0700
Re: Poor "Snit" nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-21 13:25 -0400
Re: Poor "Snit" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-21 11:52 -0700
Re: Poor "Snit" nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-21 15:07 -0400
Re: Poor "Snit" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-21 12:41 -0700
Re: Poor "Snit" nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-21 18:17 -0400
Re: Poor "Snit" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-21 08:47 -0700
Re: Poor "Snit" chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-21 09:19 -0500
Re: Poor "Snit" nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-21 10:32 -0400
Re: Poor "Snit" chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-21 09:39 -0500
Re: Poor "Snit" nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-21 10:45 -0400
Re: Poor "Snit" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-21 09:21 -0700
Re: Poor "Snit" Silver Slimer <sl@im.er> - 2017-04-21 11:59 -0400
Re: Poor "Snit" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-21 09:25 -0700
Re: Poor "Snit" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-21 09:18 -0700
Re: Poor "Snit" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-21 08:48 -0700
Re: Poor "Snit" Silver Slimer <sl@im.er> - 2017-04-21 11:56 -0400
Re: Poor "Snit" nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-21 12:14 -0400
Re: Poor "Snit" Silver Slimer <sl@im.er> - 2017-04-21 12:24 -0400
Re: Poor "Snit" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-21 09:36 -0700
Re: Poor "Snit" chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-21 12:23 -0500
Re: Poor "Snit" nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-21 13:26 -0400
Re: Poor "Snit" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-21 12:39 -0700
Re: Poor "Snit" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-21 11:17 -0700
Re: Poor "Snit" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-21 12:43 -0700
Re: Poor "Snit" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-21 09:24 -0700
Re: Poor "Snit" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-21 08:44 -0700
Re: Poor "Snit" nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-21 13:25 -0400
Re: Poor "Snit" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-21 11:20 -0700
Re: Poor "Snit" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-21 08:23 -0700
Re: Poor "Snit" nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-21 13:25 -0400
Re: Poor "Snit" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-21 11:18 -0700
Re: Poor "Snit" nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-21 10:13 -0400
Re: Poor "Snit" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-21 08:21 -0700
Re: Poor "Snit" Gene Wirchenko <genew@telus.net> - 2017-04-21 12:13 -0700
Re: Poor "Snit" nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-21 15:19 -0400
Re: Poor "Snit" Silver Slimer <sl@im.er> - 2017-04-21 17:40 -0400
Re: Poor "Snit" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-21 15:13 -0700
Re: Poor "Snit" nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-21 18:20 -0400
Re: Poor "Snit" nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-21 18:17 -0400
Re: Poor "Snit" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-21 12:42 -0700
Re: Poor "Snit" Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2017-04-21 17:21 -0400
Re: Poor "Snit" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-21 15:15 -0700
Re: Poor "Snit" nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-21 18:17 -0400
Re: Poor "Snit" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-20 13:35 -0700
Re: Poor "Snit" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-20 12:53 -0700
csiph-web