Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.sys.mac.system > #105886
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy, sci.physics, alt.privacy.anon-server, comp.sys.mac.system, alt.comp.os.windows-10 |
| Subject | Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. |
| Date | 2017-04-29 13:43 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D52A48F9.A2452%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> (permalink) |
| References | (16 earlier) <octpth$7n1$1@dont-email.me> <D517E862.9F301%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> <op.yy3x6uohjs98qf@red.lan> <D520E842.A0C9B%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> <op.yzg3o0n1js98qf@red.lan> |
Cross-posted to 5 groups.
On 4/29/17, 1:11 PM, in article op.yzg3o0n1js98qf@red.lan, "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: > On Sat, 22 Apr 2017 19:00:18 +0100, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > >> On 4/22/17, 10:43 AM, in article op.yy3x6uohjs98qf@red.lan, "James Wilkinson >> Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: >> >>>>> I give my parents the credit. >>>>> You perhaps don't know how children are born? >>>>> They have no say regarding their skin colour. >>>>> >>>>>> i'm sure you can relate to that. >>>>> >>>>> You're dumber than a brick. >>>> >>>> Keep in mind that in general it is the liberal states who give to the >>>> federal government and the conservative states who take. Not 100%, but the >>>> tendency is clearly there. >>> >>> I'm in the UK so things may be different, and I'm not sure if the labels >>> mean >>> the same thing. But here, the conservative government (right wing, >>> capitalist) saves money and doesn't spend much. The labour government (left >>> wing, socialist) spends money on everything, promising better healthcare and >>> education, and ends up putting the country into more and more debt, then the >>> conservatives have to raise the taxes to recover when they next get in, >>> which >>> of course labour blames them for. >> >> The conservatives will say the same thing about the US, but it is not how it >> works... BOTH major parties (we have only two) are paid for and beholden to >> wealthy interests. They serve the wealthy. Here is a BBC article on it: >> >> <http://www.bbc.com/news/blogs-echochambers-27074746> >> >> The Democrats put some efforts into protecting human rights and the >> environment, but generally as little as they can get away with and often >> doing things for show more than real purpose. This is what lead to us >> getting Trump who is an utter joke. > > What have you got against Trump? His lack of any qualifications are significant, but I think his utter lack of judgement might be a bigger thing. > He's the best president you've ever had. The best we have had in the last 100 days. Can't argue with that! >> The Democrats pushed through Clinton who >> was clearly serving the rich and even talked about having a public agenda >> for the people and a private agenda for them (not her exact words). It is >> pretty gross. >> >> At this point the US is the wealthiest country in the world but most of our >> new wealth goes to the very rich and they take and take and take. Then they >> control the media and push the idea, which many buy, that the poor -- those >> with the least power and ability to take ANYTHING -- are somehow the >> "takers"... a claim which makes absolutely no sense. This is a decent >> summary: >> >> <https://mitpress.mit.edu/vanishing> >> ----- >> The United States is becoming a nation of rich and poor, with few >> families in the middle. In this book, MIT economist Peter Temin >> offers an illuminating way to look at the vanishing middle class. >> Temin argues that American history and politics, particularly >> slavery and its aftermath, play an important part in the widening >> gap between rich and poor. Temin employs a well-known, simple model >> of a dual economy to examine the dynamics of the rich/poor divide in >> America, and outlines ways to work toward greater equality so that >> America will no longer have one economy for the rich and one for the >> poor. >> >> Many poorer Americans live in conditions resembling those of a >> developing country‹substandard education, dilapidated housing, and >> few stable employment opportunities. And although almost half of >> black Americans are poor, most poor people are not black. >> Conservative white politicians still appeal to the racism of poor >> white voters to get support for policies that harm low-income people >> as a whole, casting recipients of social programs as the >> Other‹black, Latino, not like "us." Politicians also use mass >> incarceration as a tool to keep black and Latino Americans from >> participating fully in society. Money goes to a vast entrenched >> prison system rather than to education. In the dual justice system, >> the rich pay fines and the poor go to jail. >> ----- >> >> It has been getting worse and worse here since the 1980s. >> >> >> > -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
Back to comp.sys.mac.system | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-29 21:11 +0100 Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-29 13:43 -0700
csiph-web