Re: A.T.A. drive or Fusion drive?

From	Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com>
Newsgroups	comp.sys.mac.system
Message-ID	<2015081912090962410-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom> (permalink)
References	(14 earlier) <2015081711215882067-tomevans9890@yahoo.ca> <d3joniFcjmjU2@mid.individual.net> <2015081909473850114-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom> <d3jrfqFcjmjU9@mid.individual.net> <55d4cb64$0$41694$c3e8da3$5d8fb80f@news.astraweb.com>
Subject	Re: A.T.A. drive or Fusion drive?
Organization	http://www.panic.com/unison/
Date	2015-08-19 12:09 -0700

Show all headers | View raw

On 2015-08-19 18:30:59 +0000, JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> said:

> On 15-08-19 13:08, Jolly Roger wrote:
> 
>> I've been away - just got caught up on this thread. Yep, if he doesn't
>> change his work flow to reduce his memory usage, he'll need more RAM.
> 
> Some type of work on Photoshop (for instance, the clone stamp to remove
> objects, fix picture) can require a lot of separate clone stamps be
> done, and at one point, you may decide to back out of it because the
> clone stamp artifacts are too visible.

With "Content Aware" Fill, and/or Healing artifacts should be minimized 
making clean up simple. If you have obvious artifact issues with the 
Clone Stamp/Brush you should be more selective regarding the clone 
source and use more feathering (a softer brush).

> 200 may be a lot though.You can work with adjustment layers to make it
> "smart" editing so you can enable/disable a modification at will. but
> actual pixel editing requires memory to be able to "undo".

Yup! 200 History States is waaay to many. In extreme cases I can find 
myself using 8-10 layers (my norm is 3-4 adjustment layers) for various 
purposes, each layer can be isolated, activated, deleted, and if it is 
a "Smart Object/Filter" layer, revisited for readjustment as needed.

I am NEVER going to need 200 history States to "undo" anything on any 
single adjustment layer, particularly if I'm working on a Smart Object 
layer. I have a hard time visualizing just how Tom goes about using 
that many History States in his workflow.

I have my PS performance preferences set at 50 History states, and PS 
is allocated 10245 MB of my 16 GB RAM. Even 50 History states is many 
more than I need, as I am probably never going to use more than 2 or 3 
"undoes" at any time.

-- 
Regards,

Savageduck

Back to comp.sys.mac.system | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Re: A.T.A. drive or Fusion drive? Tom Evans <tomevans9890@yahoo.ca> - 2015-08-01 10:11 -0700
  Re: A.T.A. drive or Fusion drive? Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-08-01 18:54 +0000
    Re: A.T.A. drive or Fusion drive? Tom Evans <tomevans9890@yahoo.ca> - 2015-08-13 13:29 -0700
      Re: A.T.A. drive or Fusion drive? Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-08-14 13:56 +0000
        Re: A.T.A. drive or Fusion drive? Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2015-08-14 15:04 -0400
          Re: A.T.A. drive or Fusion drive? Tom Evans <tomevans9890@yahoo.ca> - 2015-08-17 11:21 -0700
            Re: A.T.A. drive or Fusion drive? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-08-17 14:27 -0400
            Re: A.T.A. drive or Fusion drive? Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2015-08-18 09:07 +1200
              Re: A.T.A. drive or Fusion drive? Tom Evans <tomevans9890@yahoo.ca> - 2015-08-17 23:57 -0700
                Re: A.T.A. drive or Fusion drive? Tom Evans <tomevans9890@yahoo.ca> - 2015-08-18 00:35 -0700
                Re: A.T.A. drive or Fusion drive? Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2015-08-18 07:34 -0400
                Re: A.T.A. drive or Fusion drive? dempson@actrix.gen.nz (David Empson) - 2015-08-18 20:49 +1200
                Re: A.T.A. drive or Fusion drive? Tom Evans <tomevans9890@yahoo.ca> - 2015-08-23 13:10 -0700
                Re: A.T.A. drive or Fusion drive? Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2015-08-23 14:36 -0700
                Re: A.T.A. drive or Fusion drive? Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2015-08-23 22:54 +0000
                Re: A.T.A. drive or Fusion drive? Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2015-08-23 14:39 -0700
                Re: A.T.A. drive or Fusion drive? Alan Browne <alan.browne@freelunchvideotron.ca> - 2015-08-24 11:54 -0400
                Re: A.T.A. drive or Fusion drive? Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2015-08-18 02:32 -0700
                Re: A.T.A. drive or Fusion drive? Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2015-08-18 02:36 -0700
                Re: A.T.A. drive or Fusion drive? Tom Evans <tomevans9890@yahoo.ca> - 2015-08-23 13:37 -0700
                Re: A.T.A. drive or Fusion drive? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-08-23 16:55 -0400
                Re: A.T.A. drive or Fusion drive? Tom Evans <tomevans9890@yahoo.ca> - 2015-08-23 22:10 -0700
                Re: A.T.A. drive or Fusion drive? Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2015-08-23 22:30 -0700
                Re: A.T.A. drive or Fusion drive? Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2015-08-24 13:17 +0000
                Re: A.T.A. drive or Fusion drive? Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2015-08-24 06:58 -0700
                Re: A.T.A. drive or Fusion drive? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-08-24 01:35 -0400
                Re: A.T.A. drive or Fusion drive? Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-08-24 15:47 +0000
                Re: A.T.A. drive or Fusion drive? Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2015-08-23 14:50 -0700
                Re: A.T.A. drive or Fusion drive? Alan Browne <alan.browne@freelunchvideotron.ca> - 2015-08-24 11:55 -0400
                Re: A.T.A. drive or Fusion drive? Tom Evans <tomevans9890@yahoo.ca> - 2015-08-23 14:49 -0700
                Re: A.T.A. drive or Fusion drive? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-08-23 17:55 -0400
                Re: A.T.A. drive or Fusion drive? Tom Evans <tomevans9890@yahoo.ca> - 2015-08-23 22:06 -0700
                Re: A.T.A. drive or Fusion drive? John McWilliams <jpmcw@comcast.net> - 2015-08-23 22:25 -0700
                Re: A.T.A. drive or Fusion drive? Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2015-08-23 22:29 -0700
                Re: A.T.A. drive or Fusion drive? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-08-24 01:35 -0400
                Re: A.T.A. drive or Fusion drive? Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2015-08-24 07:02 -0700
                Re: A.T.A. drive or Fusion drive? Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-08-24 15:46 +0000
                Re: A.T.A. drive or Fusion drive? Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2015-08-23 15:00 -0700
                Re: A.T.A. drive or Fusion drive? Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2015-08-23 15:12 -0700
                Re: A.T.A. drive or Fusion drive? Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-08-24 01:37 +0000
                Re: A.T.A. drive or Fusion drive? Tom Evans <tomevans9890@yahoo.ca> - 2015-08-23 13:22 -0700
                Re: A.T.A. drive or Fusion drive? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-08-23 16:55 -0400
                Re: A.T.A. drive or Fusion drive? Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2015-08-23 14:43 -0700
                Re: A.T.A. drive or Fusion drive? Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2015-08-18 07:33 -0400
                Re: A.T.A. drive or Fusion drive? Tom Evans <tomevans9890@yahoo.ca> - 2015-08-23 13:38 -0700
                Re: A.T.A. drive or Fusion drive? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-08-18 10:56 -0400
                Re: A.T.A. drive or Fusion drive? Tom Evans <tomevans9890@yahoo.ca> - 2015-08-23 14:02 -0700
                Re: A.T.A. drive or Fusion drive? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-08-23 17:26 -0400
                Re: A.T.A. drive or Fusion drive? Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2015-08-23 14:43 -0700
                Re: A.T.A. drive or Fusion drive? Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-08-24 01:34 +0000
                Re: A.T.A. drive or Fusion drive? Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2015-08-23 15:01 -0700
                Re: A.T.A. drive or Fusion drive? John McWilliams <jpmcw@comcast.net> - 2015-08-23 22:30 -0700
                Re: A.T.A. drive or Fusion drive? Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2015-08-23 22:36 -0700
                Re: A.T.A. drive or Fusion drive? Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-08-24 15:48 +0000
                Re: A.T.A. drive or Fusion drive? Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2015-08-24 07:00 -0700
                Re: A.T.A. drive or Fusion drive? Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-08-24 01:33 +0000
                Re: A.T.A. drive or Fusion drive? Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2015-08-23 19:52 -0700
              Re: A.T.A. drive or Fusion drive? Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2015-08-18 07:26 -0400
                Re: A.T.A. drive or Fusion drive? Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2015-08-19 08:57 +1200
            Re: A.T.A. drive or Fusion drive? Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-08-19 16:21 +0000
              Re: A.T.A. drive or Fusion drive? Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2015-08-19 09:47 -0700
                Re: A.T.A. drive or Fusion drive? Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-08-19 17:08 +0000
                Re: A.T.A. drive or Fusion drive? JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2015-08-19 14:30 -0400
                Re: A.T.A. drive or Fusion drive? Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2015-08-19 12:09 -0700
        Re: A.T.A. drive or Fusion drive? Tom Evans <tomevans9890@yahoo.ca> - 2015-08-17 12:18 -0700
          Re: A.T.A. drive or Fusion drive? dempson@actrix.gen.nz (David Empson) - 2015-08-18 10:51 +1200
          Re: A.T.A. drive or Fusion drive? Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2015-08-18 07:35 -0400

csiph-web