Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.sys.mac.misc > #632

Re: The secondary is in fact a primary

Path csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!news.albasani.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From Sandman <mr@sandman.net>
Newsgroups comp.sys.mac.misc, comp.sys.mac.advocacy
Subject Re: The secondary is in fact a primary
Date Mon, 29 Aug 2011 10:01:42 +0200
Lines 48
Message-ID <mr-EFF4D6.10014129082011@News.Individual.NET> (permalink)
References <afe75e71-eb64-4971-8a83-3c01454dcf57@w11g2000vbp.googlegroups.com> <mr-1194C3.17020823082011@News.Individual.NET> <7496b3df-2b8f-4357-b69d-21ef8a4aeb3f@c29g2000yqd.googlegroups.com> <mr-9B404B.08501525082011@News.Individual.NET> <d5f416e5-7938-4fce-b6b7-973f9c4f8157@en1g2000vbb.googlegroups.com>
Mime-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding 8bit
X-Trace individual.net sRyjslA8wu7ahmpTUIMUmAlHDYsk6LyRVmE5G0lEF33EempZQ=
X-Orig-Path mr
Cancel-Lock sha1:MnroU4lYRZyJ6oeexqxOMj7iEsA=
User-Agent MT-NewsWatcher/3.5.2 (Intel Mac OS X)
X-Face $@,Vfa$,)%=Qa7L]y)&oZj_\EiHc}}A<Y3TvbI2&|e"bE9zc[o<ThMgB4%*L$b1YsNl!/ <lHO$>f0Bei"4a_%)"c6TQ+P/:53>;PNGuWUmkqyeN-qM65foJ[;T_(k;>]&G\T4Lhm:2 ujye2_,iUJFE;NZn>y;.|-hl7g~bIOF1qG\o<?]4mXkW*mT3]{Bn&VwP7(M0uYnGA!V!? {"y?BkBDW6e-.=I5
X-Killfiled yttrx, gallopinginsanity.com, Mark Kent, Maverick, Nasht.n, NRen2, MuahMan, weedhopper, PC Guy, Brian, nospam@nospam.com, Oxford, Jim Lee Jr., Mocassin Joe, zara, Chance Furlong, Robert Whelan, jt2002a@hotmail.com
Xref x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.sys.mac.misc:632 comp.sys.mac.advocacy:22155

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show key headers only | View raw


In article 
<d5f416e5-7938-4fce-b6b7-973f9c4f8157@en1g2000vbb.googlegroups.com>,
 AD <isquat@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Aug 25, 9:50 am, Sandman <m...@sandman.net> wrote:
> > In article
> > <7496b3df-2b8f-4357-b69d-21ef8a4ae...@c29g2000yqd.googlegroups.com>,
> >
> >  AD <isq...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > >http://macdevelopertips.com/system/multiple-monitors-specifying-menu-..
> > > > >..
> > > > > html
> >
> > > > > great, the menu bar is on the larger monitor. The system preferences
> > > > > nav buttons are left on the "primary"
> >
> > > > What, exactly, is the "System Preferences nav buttons"?
> >
> > > the implements you swim back and forth through the system preferences
> > > with
> >
> > Are you serious? This is some form of gripe for you?
> >
> > Close and relaunch System Preferences. It will open in the X/Y
> > position you last had it open at, which just so happens to be your
> > secondary monitor right now.
> >
> > Move it to your main monitor.
> >
> > Close System Preferences
> >
> > Open System Preferences
> >
> > Viola, it is now on your main monitor. Go to Display -> Arrangement.
> > Voila, the "nav buttons" are now on your main monitor and the
> > secondary window is on your secondary monitor.
> >
> > You're not seriously suggesting that an application should always open
> > its main window on the main monitor - disregarding where the user has
> > moved it to on the last launch?
> 
> No. It could just as well open in the last position recorded by quartz

Which, of course, it does. 


-- 
Sandman[.net]

Back to comp.sys.mac.misc | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

The secondary is in fact a primary AD <isquat@gmail.com> - 2011-08-22 00:09 -0700
  Re: The secondary is in fact a primary Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2011-08-22 07:19 -0500
    Re: The secondary is in fact a primary Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2011-08-22 10:14 -0700
  Re: The secondary is in fact a primary David <admin@confidential.com.au> - 2011-08-23 12:08 +1000
    Re: The secondary is in fact a primary AD <isquat@gmail.com> - 2011-08-22 23:35 -0700
  Re: The secondary is in fact a primary Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2011-08-23 17:02 +0200
    Re: The secondary is in fact a primary AD <isquat@gmail.com> - 2011-08-24 07:06 -0700
      Re: The secondary is in fact a primary David <admin@confidential.com.au> - 2011-08-25 09:12 +1000
      Re: The secondary is in fact a primary Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2011-08-25 08:50 +0200
        Re: The secondary is in fact a primary AD <isquat@gmail.com> - 2011-08-29 00:43 -0700
          Re: The secondary is in fact a primary Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2011-08-29 00:50 -0700
          Re: The secondary is in fact a primary Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2011-08-29 10:01 +0200

csiph-web