Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.sys.mac.misc > #632
| Path | csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!news.albasani.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | Sandman <mr@sandman.net> |
| Newsgroups | comp.sys.mac.misc, comp.sys.mac.advocacy |
| Subject | Re: The secondary is in fact a primary |
| Date | Mon, 29 Aug 2011 10:01:42 +0200 |
| Lines | 48 |
| Message-ID | <mr-EFF4D6.10014129082011@News.Individual.NET> (permalink) |
| References | <afe75e71-eb64-4971-8a83-3c01454dcf57@w11g2000vbp.googlegroups.com> <mr-1194C3.17020823082011@News.Individual.NET> <7496b3df-2b8f-4357-b69d-21ef8a4aeb3f@c29g2000yqd.googlegroups.com> <mr-9B404B.08501525082011@News.Individual.NET> <d5f416e5-7938-4fce-b6b7-973f9c4f8157@en1g2000vbb.googlegroups.com> |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 8bit |
| X-Trace | individual.net sRyjslA8wu7ahmpTUIMUmAlHDYsk6LyRVmE5G0lEF33EempZQ= |
| X-Orig-Path | mr |
| Cancel-Lock | sha1:MnroU4lYRZyJ6oeexqxOMj7iEsA= |
| User-Agent | MT-NewsWatcher/3.5.2 (Intel Mac OS X) |
| X-Face | $@,Vfa$,)%=Qa7L]y)&oZj_\EiHc}}A<Y3TvbI2&|e"bE9zc[o<ThMgB4%*L$b1YsNl!/ <lHO$>f0Bei"4a_%)"c6TQ+P/:53>;PNGuWUmkqyeN-qM65foJ[;T_(k;>]&G\T4Lhm:2 ujye2_,iUJFE;NZn>y;.|-hl7g~bIOF1qG\o<?]4mXkW*mT3]{Bn&VwP7(M0uYnGA!V!? {"y?BkBDW6e-.=I5 |
| X-Killfiled | yttrx, gallopinginsanity.com, Mark Kent, Maverick, Nasht.n, NRen2, MuahMan, weedhopper, PC Guy, Brian, nospam@nospam.com, Oxford, Jim Lee Jr., Mocassin Joe, zara, Chance Furlong, Robert Whelan, jt2002a@hotmail.com |
| Xref | x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.sys.mac.misc:632 comp.sys.mac.advocacy:22155 |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
Show key headers only | View raw
In article <d5f416e5-7938-4fce-b6b7-973f9c4f8157@en1g2000vbb.googlegroups.com>, AD <isquat@gmail.com> wrote: > On Aug 25, 9:50 am, Sandman <m...@sandman.net> wrote: > > In article > > <7496b3df-2b8f-4357-b69d-21ef8a4ae...@c29g2000yqd.googlegroups.com>, > > > > AD <isq...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > >http://macdevelopertips.com/system/multiple-monitors-specifying-menu-.. > > > > >.. > > > > > html > > > > > > > great, the menu bar is on the larger monitor. The system preferences > > > > > nav buttons are left on the "primary" > > > > > > What, exactly, is the "System Preferences nav buttons"? > > > > > the implements you swim back and forth through the system preferences > > > with > > > > Are you serious? This is some form of gripe for you? > > > > Close and relaunch System Preferences. It will open in the X/Y > > position you last had it open at, which just so happens to be your > > secondary monitor right now. > > > > Move it to your main monitor. > > > > Close System Preferences > > > > Open System Preferences > > > > Viola, it is now on your main monitor. Go to Display -> Arrangement. > > Voila, the "nav buttons" are now on your main monitor and the > > secondary window is on your secondary monitor. > > > > You're not seriously suggesting that an application should always open > > its main window on the main monitor - disregarding where the user has > > moved it to on the last launch? > > No. It could just as well open in the last position recorded by quartz Which, of course, it does. -- Sandman[.net]
Back to comp.sys.mac.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
The secondary is in fact a primary AD <isquat@gmail.com> - 2011-08-22 00:09 -0700
Re: The secondary is in fact a primary Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2011-08-22 07:19 -0500
Re: The secondary is in fact a primary Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2011-08-22 10:14 -0700
Re: The secondary is in fact a primary David <admin@confidential.com.au> - 2011-08-23 12:08 +1000
Re: The secondary is in fact a primary AD <isquat@gmail.com> - 2011-08-22 23:35 -0700
Re: The secondary is in fact a primary Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2011-08-23 17:02 +0200
Re: The secondary is in fact a primary AD <isquat@gmail.com> - 2011-08-24 07:06 -0700
Re: The secondary is in fact a primary David <admin@confidential.com.au> - 2011-08-25 09:12 +1000
Re: The secondary is in fact a primary Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2011-08-25 08:50 +0200
Re: The secondary is in fact a primary AD <isquat@gmail.com> - 2011-08-29 00:43 -0700
Re: The secondary is in fact a primary Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2011-08-29 00:50 -0700
Re: The secondary is in fact a primary Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2011-08-29 10:01 +0200
csiph-web