Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.sys.mac.apps > #35361 > unrolled thread
| Started by | me@home.spamsucks.ca (Király) |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-04-23 16:51 +0000 |
| Last post | 2016-04-26 07:26 -0400 |
| Articles | 9 — 3 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.sys.mac.apps
Graphic Converter me@home.spamsucks.ca (Király) - 2016-04-23 16:51 +0000
Re: Graphic Converter Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2016-04-23 19:53 +0000
Re: Graphic Converter Nelson <nelson@nowhere.com> - 2016-04-23 17:44 -0400
Re: Graphic Converter Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2016-04-24 03:21 +0000
Re: Graphic Converter Nelson <nelson@nowhere.com> - 2016-04-24 06:50 -0400
Re: Graphic Converter Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2016-04-24 15:31 +0000
Re: Graphic Converter me@home.spamsucks.ca (Király) - 2016-04-25 03:52 +0000
Re: Graphic Converter Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2016-04-25 16:32 +0000
Re: Graphic Converter Nelson <nelson@nowhere.com> - 2016-04-26 07:26 -0400
| From | me@home.spamsucks.ca (Király) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-23 16:51 +0000 |
| Subject | Graphic Converter |
| Message-ID | <nfg97c$usn$1@dont-email.me> |
I have a PNG of an old map, it is all black with transparent background. Is there a way with Graphic Converter to select all of the black and change it all to white, while retaining the transparent background? I can't figure out how to do that without selecting each black element individually (there are hundreds) and changing them one at a time. Thanks. -- K. Lang may your lum reek.
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-23 19:53 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <do2258Fjgq9U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #35361 |
On 2016-04-23, Király <me@home.spamsucks.ca> wrote: > I have a PNG of an old map, it is all black with transparent background. > Is there a way with Graphic Converter to select all of the black and > change it all to white, while retaining the transparent background? I > can't figure out how to do that without selecting each black element > individually (there are hundreds) and changing them one at a time. Have you tried Picture > Invert > Normal? You can accomplish what you want with an inversion filter in apps like Pixelmator, Affinity Photo, and so on as well. -- E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter. I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead. JR
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nelson <nelson@nowhere.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-23 17:44 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <0001HW.D34164FD0772F83AB02919BF@news.astraweb.com> |
| In reply to | #35361 |
On Sat, 23 Apr 2016 12:51:56 -0400, Király wrote (in article <nfg97c$usn$1@dont-email.me>): > I have a PNG of an old map, it is all black with transparent background. > Is there a way with Graphic Converter to select all of the black and > change it all to white, while retaining the transparent background? I > can't figure out how to do that without selecting each black element > individually (there are hundreds) and changing them one at a time. > Thanks. > > Extract the alpha channel to a new window. Select that window and change colors to 16 bit. Invert. Make black transparent. Save as a new png. -- Nelson
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-24 03:21 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <do2sdcFph4gU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #35373 |
Nelson <nelson@nowhere.com> wrote: > On Sat, 23 Apr 2016 12:51:56 -0400, Király wrote > > Extract the alpha channel to a new window. Select that window and > change colors to 16 bit. Invert. Make black transparent. Save as a > new png. Picture > Invert > Normal seems way simpler. Try it out. It works great here. -- E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter. I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead. JR
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nelson <nelson@nowhere.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-24 06:50 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <0001HW.D3421D1D079E1F59B02919BF@news.astraweb.com> |
| In reply to | #35380 |
On Sat, 23 Apr 2016 23:21:16 -0400, Jolly Roger wrote (in article <do2sdcFph4gU1@mid.individual.net>): > Nelson <nelson@nowhere.com> wrote: >> On Sat, 23 Apr 2016 12:51:56 -0400, Király wrote >> >> Extract the alpha channel to a new window. Select that window and >> change colors to 16 bit. Invert. Make black transparent. Save as a >> new png. > > Picture > Invert > Normal seems way simpler. Try it out. It works great > here. Yeah, that didn't work for me with the first example I tried. I'm not sure why. I may have had the white point set wrong or the color bit depth wrong or the transparency options wrong, or some other nonsense. Anyway, I just tried again and it works as you say. I'm not sure how transparency is implemented but it apparently requires an Alpha channel and the simple inversion didn't work for me in some cases. Maybe it depends on the original color that was made transparent. The sample I made to test was black text on transparent background to start with. I don't have the time or interest to figure it out :) -- Nelson
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-24 15:31 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <do477fF5eaoU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #35383 |
Nelson <nelson@nowhere.com> wrote: > On Sat, 23 Apr 2016 23:21:16 -0400, Jolly Roger wrote > (in article <do2sdcFph4gU1@mid.individual.net>): > >> Nelson <nelson@nowhere.com> wrote: >>> On Sat, 23 Apr 2016 12:51:56 -0400, Király wrote >>> >>> Extract the alpha channel to a new window. Select that window and >>> change colors to 16 bit. Invert. Make black transparent. Save as a >>> new png. >> >> Picture > Invert > Normal seems way simpler. Try it out. It works great >> here. > > Yeah, that didn't work for me with the first example I tried. I'm not > sure why. I may have had the white point set wrong or the color bit > depth wrong or the transparency options wrong, or some other nonsense. > Anyway, I just tried again and it works as you say. Interesting... > I'm not sure how transparency is implemented but it apparently requires > an Alpha channel and the simple inversion didn't work for me in some > cases. Maybe it depends on the original color that was made > transparent. The sample I made to test was black text on transparent > background to start with. > > I don't have the time or interest to figure it out :) Sounds like a plausible theory, anyway. -- E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter. I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead. JR
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | me@home.spamsucks.ca (Király) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-25 03:52 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <nfk4ar$elh$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #35383 |
Nelson <nelson@nowhere.com> wrote: > > Picture > Invert > Normal seems way simpler. Try it out. It works great > > here. > > Yeah, that didn't work for me with the first example I tried. At first I didn't think that it worked for me either, but then I zoomed in and yes all the black had turned to white. When zoomed out, for some reason GC adds a black outline to the white, making it look almost the same as the original all black image. Thanks to both of you for the help. -- K. Lang may your lum reek.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-25 16:32 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <do6v4hFqnouU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #35422 |
On 2016-04-25, Király <me@home.spamsucks.ca> wrote: > Nelson <nelson@nowhere.com> wrote: >> > Picture > Invert > Normal seems way simpler. Try it out. It works great >> > here. >> >> Yeah, that didn't work for me with the first example I tried. > > At first I didn't think that it worked for me either, but then I > zoomed in and yes all the black had turned to white. When zoomed out, > for some reason GC adds a black outline to the white, making it look > almost the same as the original all black image. That seems to be a silly design decision. > Thanks to both of you for the help. Glad you figured it out. : ) -- E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter. I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead. JR
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nelson <nelson@nowhere.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-26 07:26 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <0001HW.D344C8A800284CB5B02919BF@news.astraweb.com> |
| In reply to | #35426 |
On Mon, 25 Apr 2016 12:32:17 -0400, Jolly Roger wrote (in article <do6v4hFqnouU1@mid.individual.net>): > On 2016-04-25, Király <me@home.spamsucks.ca> wrote: >> Nelson <nelson@nowhere.com> wrote: >>>> Picture > Invert > Normal seems way simpler. Try it out. It works great >>>> here. >>> >>> Yeah, that didn't work for me with the first example I tried. >> >> At first I didn't think that it worked for me either, but then I >> zoomed in and yes all the black had turned to white. When zoomed out, >> for some reason GC adds a black outline to the white, making it look >> almost the same as the original all black image. > > That seems to be a silly design decision. Maybe not. I suspect what he is seeing is the anti-aliasing at that magnification. Lemke is a pretty smart cookie:) -- Nelson
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | comp.sys.mac.apps
csiph-web