Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register

Groups > comp.sys.mac.advocacy > #145947

Re: Snit Caught Lying Once Again.

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

On May 8, 2026 at 5:39:41 PM MST, "CrudeSausage" wrote
<69fe824e$0$20$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:

> On 2026-05-08 8:10 p.m., Chris wrote:
>> Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote in
>> news:69fe7554$0$25$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
>> 
>>> On May 8, 2026 at 4:37:34 PM MST, ""Joel W. Crump"" wrote
>>> <2tuLR.534326$ZRIe.478812@fx22.iad>:
>>> 
>>>> On 5/8/2026 7:15 PM, Brock McNuggets wrote:
>>>>> On May 8, 2026 at 4:02:18 PM MST, ""Joel W. Crump"" wrote
>>>>> <ZXtLR.316421$3L1.224468@fx45.iad>:
>>>>>> On 5/8/2026 5:45 PM, Kerwin wrote:
>>>>>>> Alan wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> There is not one person reading this messages that thinks you're
>>>>>>>> telling the truth.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Not one.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Speak for yourself.
>>>>>>> Brock McNuggets explanation makes far more sense than yours.
>>>>>>> Why do you make shit up, expect readers to believe it and then
>>>>>>> when they don't, you raise your white flag and run away?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> My mind isn't small enough to follow the alleged evidence any one
>>>>>> of the posters are referencing - but when Alan makes Snit AKA Brock
>>>>>> his enemy, it smells rather fishy.  Alan's entire life is devoted
>>>>>> to defending the greediest corporation in the history of the earth,
>>>>>> Apple, and Snit is a major enthusiast of Apple's products going
>>>>>> back as long as I've known him and more.  It reeks of Alan
>>>>>> succumbing to the peer pressure, here on 2026 Usenet, trying to
>>>>>> bully Snit.  It's pathetic.  I hate Apple and yet Snit is my
>>>>>> friend.  Alan is one of the bullies.  What gives?!
>>>>> 
>>>>> OK, forget if his accusation is true or not. He says I "forged"
>>>>> a PDF. I say I did not. Whatever. What is the full accusation
>>>>> even? I do not get it. From what I can gather (and again I admit
>>>>> I might be wrong!):
>>>>> 
>>>>> It was something like "I" posted a PDF where "I" tried to forge
>>>>> an IP by covering the IP with the same IP on a different layer.
>>>>> Somehow a different font made it seem "forged". The text was not
>>>>> even edited, and meta data not even slightly "fixed". And then
>>>>> "I" posted this to my own site with the idea that someone else
>>>>> posted it first. But how does that even work?
>>>>> 
>>>>> My recollection is someone (Mackay maybe?) had multiple versions
>>>>> and names for similar files and I did grab them and share copies
>>>>> so people could see a timeline... but I think I goofed on my
>>>>> naming or... who knows. Again, 2004 and I neither know nor care.
>>>>> 
>>>>> But with the idea of a "forgery by font change" not being
>>>>> explained, and the idea the "forgery" was done to be as easy to
>>>>> discover as possible, what he describes sounds like someone was
>>>>> trying to frame me. Was in Mackay? Sandman? Alan himself (he
>>>>> claims he discovered this forgery). I barely remember and both
>>>>> don't know and don't really care. It was... again... 2004. I
>>>>> think we can safely move on from some PDF silliness from then
>>>>> that hurt nobody (that has been claimed anyway).
>>>>> 
>>>>> Just weird he and chrisv both got stuck on it all these years
>>>>> later. Don't get it... just happy it seems both have backed off
>>>>> a bit.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Even though I can't make sense of anyone's alleged evidence, I tend
>>>> to believe you because I've never known you to bullshit.
>>> 
>>> Thank you. I did not forge a PDF. Full stop. But in this case the
>>> question to me is what the accusation even is. Usually at least they
>>> can make that coherent... idiotic stuff like I made a plea bargain.
>>> While provably false in my case, at least it is a coherent story!
>>> 
>>>> Alan is a
>>>> stand-up guy *most* of the time - but he's been known to succumb to
>>>> emotion.
>>> 
>>> I agree. Marek was like that, years ago. He and I talked with the
>>> agreement to not share -- but I think it is OK to say there is a lot
>>> of peer pressure to hate the folks the trolls call "bad guys". People
>>> fear the ostracization. That is my best guess here.
>> 
>> Snit, you are a FUCKING LIAR!
> 
> Universally recognized.
> 
>> Here is but one thread where you make false claims about Marek Novotny.
>> And there are many more where you attacked him even after he gifted you a
>> laptop for your wife to use.
>> You are a real piece of shit Michael Glasser / snit /Brock McNuggets
>> 
>> And make sure you read the other comments in the thread because people
>> pounced on your lies.
>> 
>> What a fucking piece of shit you are snit.
>> 
>> 
>> https://groups.google.com/g/comp.os.linux.advocacy/c/7DIWTgWQEdM/m/Rl-
>> GpPnhBAAJ
>> "Marek knows some CLI tools well, but he threatened my wife because I
>> noted
>> he was wrong about Linux:
>> 
>> Marek:
>> -----
>> Linux is a Server, A Cloud, A service, A mobile Platform, A
>> developers dream come true, A super cluster, a Main frame and a
>> DESKTOP. It's not JUST a desktop. You're a two-bit bullshit coward
>> who refuses to face what Linux actually is. It's too much for you,
>> obviously.
>> -----
>> 
>> Snit (referencing to the above quote):
>> ----
>> But it is not all of those things. Not even close. It is USED by
>> those things but it is NOT those things.
>> -----
>> 
>> Marek then admitted I was right, claimed I did not know what I had taught
>> him (what?) and then threatened my wife.
>> 
>> The fact he did not even know this basic concept about Linux shows he is
>> NOT
>> very technically skilled in a general sense... even if he has some
>> focused
>> knowledge.
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They
>> cannot
>> use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow
>> superior by attacking the messenger.
>> 
>> They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.
>> 
>> <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>"
> 
> The mere fact that Snit Brock McNuggets Michael Glasser Prescott
> Parasite and Computer Guy would claim that Marek admitted he was right
> is a laugh.

In the above I was right... and Marek later adopted my view. Linux is tied to
each of those things but, by itself, it is not those things.

> In every possible way, Marek was more knowledgeable about
> everything than our parasitic friend is.

I do not get the pissing contests.

> As for threatening his wife, no
> such thing ever happened. This is yet more evidence of what kind of a
> snot-nosed punk we are dealing with.

I do not even recall the threat... but he did feel bad for his actions and
sent my wife a laptop (which I ended up with when we got a newer one). I still
have it in the house, though the battery is swollen and I do not use it.

-- 
It's impossible for someone who is at war with themselves to be at peace with you.

Back to comp.sys.mac.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Re: Snit Caught Lying Once Again. Chris <Christech@prgotonmail.com> - 2026-05-09 00:10 +0000
  Re: Snit Caught Lying Once Again. CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2026-05-08 20:39 -0400
    Re: Snit Caught Lying Once Again. Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2026-05-09 02:37 +0000
    Re: Snit Caught Lying Once Again. Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2026-05-09 02:46 +0000
    Re: Snit Caught Lying Once Again. Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2026-05-09 02:56 +0000
  Re: Snit Caught Lying Once Again. Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2026-05-09 02:42 +0000
  Re: Snit Caught Lying Once Again. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2026-05-09 08:16 -0500
    Re: Snit Caught Lying Once Again. Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2026-05-09 14:51 +0000

csiph-web