Re: i7 970X = rockinghorse shit?

From	Bill Davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>
Newsgroups	comp.sys.intel
Subject	Re: i7 970X = rockinghorse shit?
Date	2011-12-01 15:22 -0500
Organization	A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID	<jb8nls$drj$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References	<4e4f82ef$1@x-privat.org> <j2oarq$iko$1@speranza.aioe.org> <4e5642af$1@x-privat.org>

Show all headers | View raw

Orson Cart wrote:
> "Tom Lake"<tlake@twcny.rr.com>  wrote:
>>
>> The 980X might be available cheaper now that the 990X is out.
>>
>
> Actually there is no 970X: I was lead astray by sloppy people
> who recited 970X, 98OX and 990X when the 970 is locked, so
> no suffix. Anyway the 970 seems to be not common. I found a
> local computer shop that had some leftover, but they wanted
> 499 A$ (= 520 US$) for it.  I can get a Phenom sixpack with
> mainboard and RAM for less that that.

I am VERY happy with my 950s, I run as virtual hosting servers, not games, one 
is o/c (curiosity, not need for speed), one stock. Both dead stable.

Back to comp.sys.intel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar

Thread

i7 970X = rockinghorse shit? "Orson Cart" <ex-privat@parts.org> - 2011-08-20 11:48 +0100
  Re: i7 970X = rockinghorse shit? "Tom Lake" <tlake@twcny.rr.com> - 2011-08-20 08:53 -0400
    Re: i7 970X = rockinghorse shit? "Orson Cart" <ex-privat@parts.org> - 2011-08-25 14:40 +0100
      Re: i7 970X = rockinghorse shit? Bill Davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com> - 2011-12-01 15:22 -0500

csiph-web