Re: i7 970X = rockinghorse shit?

From	"Orson Cart" <ex-privat@parts.org>
Subject	Re: i7 970X = rockinghorse shit?
Newsgroups	comp.sys.intel
References	<4e4f82ef$1@x-privat.org> <j2oarq$iko$1@speranza.aioe.org>
Message-ID	<4e5642af$1@x-privat.org> (permalink)
Date	2011-08-25 14:40 +0100
Organization	X-Privat NNTP Server - http://www.x-privat.org

Show all headers | View raw

"Tom Lake" <tlake@twcny.rr.com> wrote:
>
>The 980X might be available cheaper now that the 990X is out.
>

Actually there is no 970X: I was lead astray by sloppy people
who recited 970X, 98OX and 990X when the 970 is locked, so
no suffix. Anyway the 970 seems to be not common. I found a
local computer shop that had some leftover, but they wanted
499 A$ (= 520 US$) for it.  I can get a Phenom sixpack with
mainboard and RAM for less that that.

Back to comp.sys.intel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

i7 970X = rockinghorse shit? "Orson Cart" <ex-privat@parts.org> - 2011-08-20 11:48 +0100
  Re: i7 970X = rockinghorse shit? "Tom Lake" <tlake@twcny.rr.com> - 2011-08-20 08:53 -0400
    Re: i7 970X = rockinghorse shit? "Orson Cart" <ex-privat@parts.org> - 2011-08-25 14:40 +0100
      Re: i7 970X = rockinghorse shit? Bill Davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com> - 2011-12-01 15:22 -0500

csiph-web