Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.sys.intel > #278
| From | Intel Guy <Intel@Guy.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.sys.intel |
| Subject | Re: NSA and Intel |
| Date | 2013-07-15 12:10 -0400 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <51E41F07.1C88C0EA@Guy.com> (permalink) |
| References | <18248487e7c2f35a5ba8403db8539efb@breaka.net> |
Anonymous wrote: > Why backdoor just one brand of compiler (since there are several), > when you could backdoor the architecture? > > I'm pretty sure there is a special sequence of intel instructions > which open the unicorn gate, and pipe a copy of all memory writes > to NSA's server. You don't think that there have been enough people running enough network-snooping tools and firewall appliances over the past 15-20 years that would have discovered any back-channel communication to the NSA?
Back to comp.sys.intel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
NSA and Intel Anonymous <noreply@breaka.net> - 2013-07-14 11:03 +0800
Re: NSA and Intel Intel Guy <Intel@Guy.com> - 2013-07-15 12:10 -0400
Re: NSA and Intel Yousuf Khan <bbbl67@spammenot.yahoo.com> - 2013-08-15 13:03 -0400
Re: NSA and Intel gran.pc@gmail.com - 2013-09-16 05:28 -0700
Re: NSA and Intel Yousuf Khan <bbbl67@spammenot.yahoo.com> - 2013-09-22 14:26 -0400
Re: NSA and Intel "Jim" <gtfo@stfu.invalid> - 2014-03-01 07:02 -0500
csiph-web