Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.storage > #6427
| From | Daniel James <daniel@me.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.storage, uk.comp.homebuilt |
| Subject | Re: Cannot access new Seagate external HD |
| Date | 2015-09-14 13:03 +0100 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <VA.00000af2.3dcd150a@me.invalid> (permalink) |
| References | (1 earlier) <d5eridF4u7uU1@mid.individual.net> <VA.00000aec.2ed44909@me.invalid> <d5icghF150uU1@mid.individual.net> <VA.00000af0.35282a06@me.invalid> <d5nhgjF9tvlU1@mid.individual.net> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
In article <d5nhgjF9tvlU1@mid.individual.net>, VanguardLH wrote: > http://www.seagate.com/support/downloads/beyond-2tb > http://www.paragon-software.com/hgst/index.html > > You must use some windowed or overlayed access to the >2TB disk. > There have been disk managers like this for long time: another > showing every time another disk or BIOS boundary gets hit as > manufacturers keep producing bigger disks. Ah, Disk Managers ... there's a blast from the past. I remember having to install a disk manager to use a 1.3GB HDD on a Toshiba 486 notebook. You don't /usually/ have to resort to such things, these days, but I guess using a HDD >2TB on a legacy XP system is not a usual case. > Some do not run as a driver inside of the OS > but instead usurp the MBR bootstrap code. They overcome the MBR > partition record limitation of 2^32 but how is FM to me. I'd guess that they don't. If you're using a disk manager you can store your own partitioning information somewhere other than the MBR in any format you please ... and you can use 64-bit partition addresses to get around the 2TB limitation. I notice that each partition *size*, under the Seagate scheme, is still limited to 2TB, which must be so that any volume size limits inside the OS are still honoured. The first partition on the HDD would be the system partition, and it would be described by a normal partition table in the MBR. The OS would boot from that partition and load a driver that knew where to look for the second and subsequent partitions (because the partition table couldn't store their locations). There'd probably be a special partition table in a format the Disk Manager software understood in a normally unused part of the disk (such as sector 2, the sector immediately following sector 1, in the unused area before the start of the OS) Disk managers work well enough in most cases, but I shouldn't be at all surprised to learn that they fail with (say) dual-boot systems, or systems with encryption software (which typically also uses sector 2). > Your layering in software to handle what the OS and/or BIOS > cannot handle. I prefer hardware solutions, if available, like > getting a UEFI mobo and using a newer OS that are designed to pair > well. Agreed! -- Cheers, Daniel.
Back to comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.storage | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Cannot access new Seagate external HD Terry Pinnell <me@somewhere.invalid> - 2015-09-10 19:20 +0100
Re: Cannot access new Seagate external HD Chronos <usenet@chronos.org.uk> - 2015-09-10 19:50 +0100
Re: Cannot access new Seagate external HD Terry Pinnell <me@somewhere.invalid> - 2015-09-10 20:11 +0100
Re: Cannot access new Seagate external HD Terry Pinnell <me@somewhere.invalid> - 2015-09-10 20:46 +0100
Re: Cannot access new Seagate external HD Terry Pinnell <me@somewhere.invalid> - 2015-09-10 21:07 +0100
Re: Cannot access new Seagate external HD Chronos <usenet@chronos.org.uk> - 2015-09-10 22:10 +0100
Re: Cannot access new Seagate external HD Mike Tomlinson <mike@jasper.org.uk> - 2015-09-11 00:22 +0100
Re: Cannot access new Seagate external HD Mike Tomlinson <mike@jasper.org.uk> - 2015-09-11 00:16 +0100
Re: Cannot access new Seagate external HD Terry Pinnell <me@somewhere.invalid> - 2015-09-11 07:16 +0100
Re: Cannot access new Seagate external HD Daniel James <daniel@me.invalid> - 2015-09-11 15:17 +0100
Re: Cannot access new Seagate external HD Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2015-09-11 11:30 -0300
Re: Cannot access new Seagate external HD Mark Perkins <mark@none.invalid> - 2015-09-11 09:35 -0500
Re: Cannot access new Seagate external HD Mike Tomlinson <mike@jasper.org.uk> - 2015-09-11 21:22 +0100
Re: Cannot access new Seagate external HD Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2015-09-10 16:18 -0300
Re: Cannot access new Seagate external HD Terry Pinnell <me@somewhere.invalid> - 2015-09-10 21:08 +0100
Re: Cannot access new Seagate external HD Ed Light <nobody@nobody.there> - 2015-09-10 14:30 -0700
Re: Cannot access new Seagate external HD micky <NONONOmisc07@bigfoot.com> - 2015-09-10 21:17 -0400
Re: Cannot access new Seagate external HD Terry Pinnell <me@somewhere.invalid> - 2015-09-11 07:23 +0100
Re: Cannot access new Seagate external HD VanguardLH <V@nguard.LH> - 2015-09-10 21:11 -0500
Re: Cannot access new Seagate external HD Daniel James <daniel@me.invalid> - 2015-09-11 15:17 +0100
Re: Cannot access new Seagate external HD VanguardLH <V@nguard.LH> - 2015-09-12 05:18 -0500
Re: Cannot access new Seagate external HD Daniel James <daniel@me.invalid> - 2015-09-12 20:46 +0100
Re: Cannot access new Seagate external HD VanguardLH <V@nguard.LH> - 2015-09-14 04:14 -0500
Re: Cannot access new Seagate external HD Daniel James <daniel@me.invalid> - 2015-09-14 13:03 +0100
Re: Cannot access new Seagate external HD Mark Perkins <mark@none.invalid> - 2015-09-14 21:10 -0500
Re: Cannot access new Seagate external HD Daniel James <daniel@me.invalid> - 2015-09-11 15:17 +0100
Re: Cannot access new Seagate external HD Terry Pinnell <me@somewhere.invalid> - 2015-09-12 07:05 +0100
csiph-web