Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.sys.atari.8bit > #1325
| From | Ken Springer <wordworks@greeleynet.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.sys.atari.8bit, comp.sys.cbm |
| Subject | Re: ATARI is crap! |
| Date | 2016-01-31 19:45 -0700 |
| Organization | albasani.net |
| Message-ID | <n8mgrk$br8$1@news.albasani.net> (permalink) |
| References | (7 earlier) <n8jmki$6t1$1@news.albasani.net> <n8k5d1$6ug$1@news.albasani.net> <310120161938022687%YourName@YourISP.com> <n8l631$630$1@news.albasani.net> <010220161324403116%YourName@YourISP.com> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
On 1/31/16 5:24 PM, Your Name wrote:
> In article <n8l631$630$1@news.albasani.net>, Ken Springer
> <wordworks@greeleynet.com> wrote:
>> On 1/30/16 11:38 PM, Your Name wrote:
>>> In article <n8k5d1$6ug$1@news.albasani.net>, Ken Springer
>>> <wordworks@greeleynet.com> wrote:
>>>> On 1/30/16 6:06 PM, Ken Springer wrote:
>>>>> On 1/30/16 5:39 PM, Your Name wrote:
>>>>>> In article <n8jd9f$lhc$1@news.albasani.net>, Ken Springer
>>>>>> <wordworks@greeleynet.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> On 1/30/16 2:02 PM, Your Name wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> That crappy "keyboard" is probably one of the reasons we bought the VIC
>>>>>>>> 20 instead.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I looked at the VIC 20, screen display was much better for the Atari
>>>>>>> 400/800, so I went with the 800.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The quality of the screen display was partly governed by what you
>>>>>> plugged the computer into - plugging it into a crappy old B/W TV is
>>>>>> different to a then-modern-day colour TV. :-)
>>>>
>>>> I wasn't referring to the quality of the output device, but the display
>>>> resolution. VIC 20 176 X 184 Atari 800 320 X 192
>>>
>>> Maybe, but plug the VIC20 into a good quality screen and it can look
>>> better than the Atari plugged into a crap quality screen. :-)
>>
>> Now, that's not fair! LOL Plug them into the same screen. Of course,
>> back then it was likely to be a TV, and the size of the TV also made a
>> difference.
>>
>> When I bought my 800, I bought a 10" TV for the monitor. Salesman
>> thought I was nuts. "Too small", he said. It was great!. Went back
>> and told him how good it was, and talked him into trying it. All of a
>> sudden, all the display Atari systems had those TVs attached.
>
> Our VIC20 was originally plugged into the biggish (for the time) family
> lounge room TV, but later we got a smaller one especially for it and
> the later C64 (although also occasionally used to watch TV shows). I
> can't remember what sizes they were though.
>
> Later at university and work I used the first Macs which were little 9"
> screens monochrome. I used those for years in various Mac models.
>
> When I later got my 17" screen it seemed massive - I'm still using a
> 17" CRT screen. :-)
I've got 3 systems here with 19" CRTs, 1 dual boot XP/Vista. 1 PowerMac
6400, 1 Hades 060 Atari clone.
--
Ken
Mac OS X 10.8.5
Firefox 44.0
Thunderbird 38.0.1
"My brain is like lightning, a quick flash
and it's gone!"
Back to comp.sys.atari.8bit | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
ATARI is crap! "Harald Habenichts" <po@p.o> - 2016-01-12 22:28 +0100
Re: ATARI is crap! Michael Glaser <michael.sean.glaser@gmail.com> - 2016-01-16 21:14 -0800
Re: ATARI is crap! Trevor <trevor.removethispart@holyoak.com> - 2016-01-22 12:40 -0700
Re: ATARI is crap! CharlieChaplin <andiko@web.de> - 2016-01-25 10:32 -0800
Re: ATARI is crap! "Adelbert Affenstaat" <a@ff.e> - 2016-01-29 22:24 +0100
Re: ATARI is crap! Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2016-01-30 12:36 +1300
Re: ATARI is crap! Ken Springer <wordworks@greeleynet.com> - 2016-01-30 08:08 -0700
Re: ATARI is crap! Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2016-01-31 10:02 +1300
Re: ATARI is crap! Ken Springer <wordworks@greeleynet.com> - 2016-01-30 15:26 -0700
Re: ATARI is crap! Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2016-01-31 13:39 +1300
Re: ATARI is crap! Ken Springer <wordworks@greeleynet.com> - 2016-01-30 18:06 -0700
Re: ATARI is crap! Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2016-01-31 17:49 +1300
Re: ATARI is crap! Ken Springer <wordworks@greeleynet.com> - 2016-01-30 22:17 -0700
Re: ATARI is crap! Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2016-01-31 19:38 +1300
Re: ATARI is crap! Ken Springer <wordworks@greeleynet.com> - 2016-01-31 07:35 -0700
Re: ATARI is crap! Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2016-02-01 13:24 +1300
Re: ATARI is crap! Ken Springer <wordworks@greeleynet.com> - 2016-01-31 19:45 -0700
Re: ATARI is crap! Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2016-02-01 16:31 +1300
Re: ATARI is crap! Clu <drclu@swbell.net> - 2016-02-05 10:49 -0600
Re: ATARI is crap! Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2016-02-06 09:57 +1300
Re: ATARI is crap! Dombo <dombo@disposable.invalid> - 2016-01-31 21:56 +0100
csiph-web