Re: ATARI is crap!

From	Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com>
Newsgroups	comp.sys.atari.8bit, comp.sys.cbm
Subject	Re: ATARI is crap!
Date	2016-01-31 10:02 +1300
Organization	Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID	<310120161002140418%YourName@YourISP.com> (permalink)
References	<n73r5f$rj1$1@gioia.aioe.org> <n8gla1$9k2$1@gioia.aioe.org> <300120161236028292%YourName@YourISP.com> <n8ijjh$6np$1@news.albasani.net>

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

In article <n8ijjh$6np$1@news.albasani.net>, Ken Springer
<wordworks@greeleynet.com> wrote:
> On 1/29/16 4:36 PM, Your Name wrote:
> > In article <n8gla1$9k2$1@gioia.aioe.org>, Adelbert Affenstaat <a@ff.e>
> > wrote:
> >> "Harald Habenichts" <po@p.o> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
> >> news:n73r5f$rj1$1@gioia.aioe.org...
> >>>
> >>> The C64 has much better sound, much better graphics and there are more and
> >>> better games!
> >>
> >> The ATARI 800 only has crappy games, because the ATARI has crappy sprites,
> >> crappy colours and a mediocre sound chip.
> >>
> >> The C64 is MUCH better!
> >>
> >> The SID is great, the VIC is great, the C64 is great!
> >
> >  From memory, the early Atari models also had the same ridiculous
> > membrane "keyboard" as Sinclair's toys.
> 
> IIRC, only the 400 had the membrane keyboard.  The 800 and later all had 
> keyboards.

That's why I said "early Atari models".   :-)

That crappy "keyboard" is probably one of the reasons we bought the VIC
20 instead.

Back to comp.sys.atari.8bit | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

ATARI is crap! "Harald Habenichts" <po@p.o> - 2016-01-12 22:28 +0100
  Re: ATARI is crap! Michael Glaser <michael.sean.glaser@gmail.com> - 2016-01-16 21:14 -0800
    Re: ATARI is crap! Trevor <trevor.removethispart@holyoak.com> - 2016-01-22 12:40 -0700
  Re: ATARI is crap! CharlieChaplin <andiko@web.de> - 2016-01-25 10:32 -0800
  Re: ATARI is crap! "Adelbert Affenstaat" <a@ff.e> - 2016-01-29 22:24 +0100
    Re: ATARI is crap! Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2016-01-30 12:36 +1300
      Re: ATARI is crap! Ken Springer <wordworks@greeleynet.com> - 2016-01-30 08:08 -0700
        Re: ATARI is crap! Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2016-01-31 10:02 +1300
          Re: ATARI is crap! Ken Springer <wordworks@greeleynet.com> - 2016-01-30 15:26 -0700
            Re: ATARI is crap! Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2016-01-31 13:39 +1300
              Re: ATARI is crap! Ken Springer <wordworks@greeleynet.com> - 2016-01-30 18:06 -0700
                Re: ATARI is crap! Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2016-01-31 17:49 +1300
                Re: ATARI is crap! Ken Springer <wordworks@greeleynet.com> - 2016-01-30 22:17 -0700
                Re: ATARI is crap! Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2016-01-31 19:38 +1300
                Re: ATARI is crap! Ken Springer <wordworks@greeleynet.com> - 2016-01-31 07:35 -0700
                Re: ATARI is crap! Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2016-02-01 13:24 +1300
                Re: ATARI is crap! Ken Springer <wordworks@greeleynet.com> - 2016-01-31 19:45 -0700
                Re: ATARI is crap! Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2016-02-01 16:31 +1300
                Re: ATARI is crap! Clu <drclu@swbell.net> - 2016-02-05 10:49 -0600
                Re: ATARI is crap! Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2016-02-06 09:57 +1300
    Re: ATARI is crap! Dombo <dombo@disposable.invalid> - 2016-01-31 21:56 +0100

csiph-web