Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.sys.acorn.misc > #5037 > unrolled thread

RPC and BT?

Back to article view | Back to comp.sys.acorn.misc

Contents

  RPC and BT? "Dave Plowman (News)" <dave@davenoise.co.uk> - 2012-04-22 13:04 +0100
    Re: RPC and BT? Tim Hill <tim@invalid.org.uk> - 2012-04-22 13:29 +0100
      Re: RPC and BT? Doug Webb <doug.j.webb@btinternet.com> - 2012-04-22 13:56 +0100
        Re: RPC and BT? Jeremy Nicoll - news posts <jn.nntp.scrap007@wingsandbeaks.org.uk> - 2012-04-22 14:36 +0100
          Re: RPC and BT? Doug Webb <doug.j.webb@btinternet.com> - 2012-04-22 17:08 +0100
        Re: RPC and BT? Tim Hill <tim@invalid.org.uk> - 2012-04-22 15:20 +0100
    Re: RPC and BT? spampling <spam.pling@btinternet.com> - 2012-04-22 14:06 +0100
      Re: RPC and BT? Russell Hafter News <see.sig@walkingingermany.invalid> - 2012-04-22 16:05 +0100
        Re: RPC and BT? T M Smith <thomas.smith57@ntlworld.com> - 2012-04-22 22:04 +0100
          Re: RPC and BT? Doug Webb <doug.j.webb@btinternet.com> - 2012-04-22 22:26 +0100
            Re: RPC and BT? T M Smith <thomas.smith57@ntlworld.com> - 2012-04-22 22:43 +0100
            Re: RPC and BT? Stuart <Spambin@argonet.co.uk> - 2012-04-22 23:08 +0100
              Re: RPC and BT? Tony Moore <old_coaster@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-04-22 23:03 +0000
                Re: RPC and BT? Stuart <Spambin@argonet.co.uk> - 2012-04-23 09:06 +0100
              Re: RPC and BT? Rick Murray <heyrickmail-usenet@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-04-23 02:15 +0200
                Re: RPC and BT? spampling <spam.pling@btinternet.com> - 2012-04-23 19:57 +0100
                  Re: RPC and BT? Rick Murray <heyrickmail-usenet@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-04-24 05:25 +0200
                    Re: RPC and BT? cferris@freeRemoveuk.com.invalid - 2012-04-24 13:25 +0100
              Re: RPC and BT? Rosemary Miskin <miskin@orpheusmail.co.uk> - 2012-04-23 19:20 +0100
        Re: RPC and BT? Stuart <Spambin@argonet.co.uk> - 2012-04-22 23:16 +0100
          Re: RPC and BT? spampling <spam.pling@btinternet.com> - 2012-04-23 20:01 +0100
            Re: RPC and BT? Stuart <Spambin@argonet.co.uk> - 2012-04-24 09:30 +0100
        Re: RPC and BT? spampling <spam.pling@btinternet.com> - 2012-04-23 00:01 +0100

Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]

#5087

In article <52849ca576Spambin@argonet.co.uk>,
   Stuart <Spambin@argonet.co.uk> wrote:

> Also, any decent person would be appalled at the dreadful, unethical way
> they treat their staff.

Apparently some of them are being asked to transfer their working area this
summer to cover repair work at some five ring circus based in London.
The cheeky managers are only prepared to pay for apartments rather than
five star hotels.

Oh and they apparently have to put up with an inflation increment that is
only a magnitude larger than the inflation rate.

-- 

Steve Pampling

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#5093

In article <52850eab94spam.pling@btinternet.com>,
   spampling <spam.pling@btinternet.com> wrote:
> > Also, any decent person would be appalled at the dreadful, unethical
> > way they treat their staff.

> Apparently some of them are being asked to transfer their working area
> this summer to cover repair work at some five ring circus based in
> London. The cheeky managers are only prepared to pay for apartments
> rather than five star hotels.

> Oh and they apparently have to put up with an inflation increment that
> is only a magnitude larger than the inflation rate.

Perhaps I am party to some information you are not >-|

-- 
Stuart Winsor

Only plain text for emails
http://www.asciiribbon.org

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#5071

In article <5284752fe6see.sig@walkingingermany.invalid>,
   Russell Hafter News <see.sig@walkingingermany.invalid> wrote:
> In article <52846a5395spam.pling@btinternet.com>,
>    spampling <spam.pling@btinternet.com> wrote:

> > Works fine, but the individual user accounts have
> > individual passwords that MUST be used when sending mail.

> I have no intention of ever again, ever, having anything to
> do with BT directly. I leave that soul-destroying task to my
> telco. It is, in part, what I pay them for.

> But, just out of interest, you could presumably still send
> your e-mail via a third-party SMTP server using SMTP
> Authentication? Or does BT block that too?

It isn't blocking - each account name has its own security. The Pipex setup
accepted stuff from one account for all the aliases, the BT setup has
aliases available but also distinct account names.

I carried on using the Pipex for a while after the change so that isn't
blocked.

-- 

Steve Pampling

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]

Back to top | Article view | comp.sys.acorn.misc

csiph-web