Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register
Groups > comp.sys.acorn.advocacy > #31
| From | John <newsmcc@blueyonder.co.uk> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.sys.acorn.advocacy |
| Subject | Re: Virtual Acorn and UAC |
| Date | 2016-02-06 16:36 +0000 |
| Organization | None |
| Message-ID | <554dbe57c0newsmcc@blueyonder.co.uk> (permalink) |
| References | (9 earlier) <9ef205a4-8627-4570-b45f-2882e02ed3c1@googlegroups.com> <mpro.o0hcml001z0f50hso.atdotcodotuk@dotcodotukat.co.uk> <mpro.o0hln900f33uk06d4.lists@thesandfords.me.uk> <mpro.o0hn5m00a3gyg0hso.atdotcodotuk@dotcodotukat.co.uk> <Zxjty.558259$pB6.403684@fx41.am4> |
In article <Zxjty.558259$pB6.403684@fx41.am4>, Krzysztof Staniorowski <helloFUCKSPAM@ksx4system.net> wrote: > Does it really make sense to use RISC OS on top of > Windows? If I had to dedicate a PC for virtual RISC OS > I'd use GNU/Linux. It can be done by using RPCEmu but, in my limited experience of that emulator, it is not nearly as polished nor as easy to install as VRPC from Virtual Acorn. John -- John newsmcc@blueyonder.co.uk j dot mccartney atte blueyonder dot co dot uk
Back to comp.sys.acorn.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Re: Virtual Acorn and UAC John Sandford <lists@thesandfords.me.uk> - 2016-01-05 15:57 +0000
Re: Virtual Acorn and UAC Vince M Hudd <atdotcodotuk@dotcodotukat.co.uk> - 2016-01-05 16:29 +0000
Re: Virtual Acorn and UAC Krzysztof Staniorowski <helloFUCKSPAM@ksx4system.net> - 2016-02-06 10:03 +0000
Re: Virtual Acorn and UAC Vince M Hudd <atdotcodotuk@dotcodotukat.co.uk> - 2016-02-06 11:13 +0000
Re: Virtual Acorn and UAC John <newsmcc@blueyonder.co.uk> - 2016-02-06 16:36 +0000
Re: Virtual Acorn and UAC Steve Fryatt <news@stevefryatt.org.uk> - 2016-02-06 17:05 +0000
Re: Virtual Acorn and UAC Krzysztof Staniorowski <helloPLZNOSPAM@ksx4system.net> - 2016-02-07 07:35 +0000
Re: Virtual Acorn and UAC John <newsmcc@blueyonder.co.uk> - 2016-02-07 07:50 +0000
csiph-web