Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register


Groups > comp.sys.acorn.advocacy > #34

Re: Virtual Acorn and UAC

From John <newsmcc@blueyonder.co.uk>
Newsgroups comp.sys.acorn.advocacy
Subject Re: Virtual Acorn and UAC
Date 2016-02-07 07:50 +0000
Organization None
Message-ID <554e11f9fcnewsmcc@blueyonder.co.uk> (permalink)
References (11 earlier) <mpro.o0hln900f33uk06d4.lists@thesandfords.me.uk> <mpro.o0hn5m00a3gyg0hso.atdotcodotuk@dotcodotukat.co.uk> <Zxjty.558259$pB6.403684@fx41.am4> <554dbe57c0newsmcc@blueyonder.co.uk> <mpro.o24y4x07u0rkg01xz.news@stevefryatt.org.uk>

Show all headers | View raw


In article
<mpro.o24y4x07u0rkg01xz.news@stevefryatt.org.uk>, Steve
Fryatt <news@stevefryatt.org.uk> wrote:
> On 6 Feb, John wrote in message
>     <554dbe57c0newsmcc@blueyonder.co.uk>:

> > In article <Zxjty.558259$pB6.403684@fx41.am4>,
> > Krzysztof Staniorowski <helloFUCKSPAM@ksx4system.net>
> > wrote:
> > 
> > > Does it really make sense to use RISC OS on top of
> > > Windows? If I had to dedicate a PC for virtual RISC
> > > OS I'd use GNU/Linux.
> > 
> > It can be done by using RPCEmu but, in my limited
> > experience of that emulator, it is not nearly as
> > polished nor as easy to install as VRPC from Virtual
> > Acorn.

> I don't know what current versions of VA are like, but
> I'm finding the current RPCEmu + RISC OS 5.23 more stable
> than post-Iyonix native hardware at present.

I can't comment on the stability of RPCEmu because I've
never got it to point where I could rely on it to be my
main machine. For me, VRPC is very reliable. Once in a blue
moon cmos.ram gets corrupted but this is easily recognised
and corrected.

Thanks to colleagues in the Midlands User Group, I have
instructions on how to install it onto Linux. When I find
the time I shall see how I get on with it but, while I have
VRPC working well, it will remain an academic exercise.

John

-- 
John
newsmcc@blueyonder.co.uk
j dot mccartney atte blueyonder dot co dot uk

Back to comp.sys.acorn.advocacy | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Find similar


Thread

Re: Virtual Acorn and UAC John Sandford <lists@thesandfords.me.uk> - 2016-01-05 15:57 +0000
  Re: Virtual Acorn and UAC Vince M Hudd <atdotcodotuk@dotcodotukat.co.uk> - 2016-01-05 16:29 +0000
    Re: Virtual Acorn and UAC Krzysztof Staniorowski <helloFUCKSPAM@ksx4system.net> - 2016-02-06 10:03 +0000
      Re: Virtual Acorn and UAC Vince M Hudd <atdotcodotuk@dotcodotukat.co.uk> - 2016-02-06 11:13 +0000
      Re: Virtual Acorn and UAC John <newsmcc@blueyonder.co.uk> - 2016-02-06 16:36 +0000
        Re: Virtual Acorn and UAC Steve Fryatt <news@stevefryatt.org.uk> - 2016-02-06 17:05 +0000
          Re: Virtual Acorn and UAC Krzysztof Staniorowski <helloPLZNOSPAM@ksx4system.net> - 2016-02-07 07:35 +0000
          Re: Virtual Acorn and UAC John <newsmcc@blueyonder.co.uk> - 2016-02-07 07:50 +0000

csiph-web