Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.std.c++ > #613 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Helmut Zeisel <zei2011@liwest.at> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2013-04-16 12:41 -0700 |
| Last post | 2013-04-20 05:19 -0700 |
| Articles | 5 — 4 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.std.c++
N3417: Proposal for Unbounded-Precision Integer Types Helmut Zeisel <zei2011@liwest.at> - 2013-04-16 12:41 -0700
Re: N3417: Proposal for Unbounded-Precision Integer Types Martin Shobe <martin.shobe@travelport.com> - 2013-04-18 10:09 -0600
Re: N3417: Proposal for Unbounded-Precision Integer Types Pete Becker <pete@versatilecoding.com> - 2013-04-18 10:08 -0600
Re: N3417: Proposal for Unbounded-Precision Integer Types rkadeFR <contact@rkade.fr> - 2013-04-19 08:12 -0700
Re: N3417: Proposal for Unbounded-Precision Integer Types Pete Becker <pete@versatilecoding.com> - 2013-04-20 05:19 -0700
| From | Helmut Zeisel <zei2011@liwest.at> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-04-16 12:41 -0700 |
| Subject | N3417: Proposal for Unbounded-Precision Integer Types |
| Message-ID | <20f3e5fa-9261-4fe7-9860-c617fe76636c@googlegroups.com> |
What should be the result of unsigned_integer(-1) ? Helmut -- [ comp.std.c++ is moderated. To submit articles, try posting with your ] [ newsreader. If that fails, use mailto:std-cpp-submit@vandevoorde.com ] [ --- Please see the FAQ before posting. --- ] [ FAQ: http://www.comeaucomputing.com/csc/faq.html ]
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Martin Shobe <martin.shobe@travelport.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-04-18 10:09 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <kkmkjm$efv$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #613 |
On 4/16/2013 2:41 PM, Helmut Zeisel wrote: > What should be the result of unsigned_integer(-1) ? > > Helmut > > The desire to remove unsigned_integer from the proposal. :) While I can appreciate the desire for symmetry with the limited precision integers, that symmetry is going to be broken with unlimited precision integers. I personally would rather see unsigned_integer be a special case of a more general bounded integer proposal. One where the programmer could specify an arbitrary upper and lower bound. Martin Shobe -- [ comp.std.c++ is moderated. To submit articles, try posting with your ] [ newsreader. If that fails, use mailto:std-cpp-submit@vandevoorde.com ] [ --- Please see the FAQ before posting. --- ] [ FAQ: http://www.comeaucomputing.com/csc/faq.html ]
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Pete Becker <pete@versatilecoding.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-04-18 10:08 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <2013041708460516615-pete@versatilecodingcom> |
| In reply to | #613 |
On 2013-04-16 19:41:18 +0000, Helmut Zeisel said: > What should be the result of unsigned_integer(-1) ? > It's an error. -- Pete [ comp.std.c++ is moderated. To submit articles, try posting with your ] [ newsreader. If that fails, use mailto:std-cpp-submit@vandevoorde.com ] [ --- Please see the FAQ before posting. --- ] [ FAQ: http://www.comeaucomputing.com/csc/faq.html ]
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | rkadeFR <contact@rkade.fr> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-04-19 08:12 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <kkp2r7$nfp$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #615 |
On 18/04/2013 18:08, Pete Becker wrote: > > > On 2013-04-16 19:41:18 +0000, Helmut Zeisel said: > >> What should be the result of unsigned_integer(-1) ? >> > > It's an error. > Is it Undefined behavior ? -- rkadeFR -- [ comp.std.c++ is moderated. To submit articles, try posting with your ] [ newsreader. If that fails, use mailto:std-cpp-submit@vandevoorde.com ] [ --- Please see the FAQ before posting. --- ] [ FAQ: http://www.comeaucomputing.com/csc/faq.html ]
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Pete Becker <pete@versatilecoding.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-04-20 05:19 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <2013041908421033573-pete@versatilecodingcom> |
| In reply to | #615 |
On 2013-04-18 10:08:30 +0000, Pete Becker said: > On 2013-04-16 19:41:18 +0000, Helmut Zeisel said: > >> What should be the result of unsigned_integer(-1) ? >> > > It's an error. Well, no, no longer. It's gone, replaced by the bits class, a dynamic bit set. -- Pete [ comp.std.c++ is moderated. To submit articles, try posting with your ] [ newsreader. If that fails, use mailto:std-cpp-submit@vandevoorde.com ] [ --- Please see the FAQ before posting. --- ] [ FAQ: http://www.comeaucomputing.com/csc/faq.html ]
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | comp.std.c++
csiph-web