Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | Daniel Krügler <daniel.kruegler@googlemail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.std.c++ |
| Subject | Re: Defect Report: global scope qualified base class specifications |
| Date | 2011-11-02 11:19 -0700 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <j8q20j$b8n$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <1fb48309-908a-430a-9455-2884493bda8a@t38g2000prg.googlegroups.com> <ed5c7fbf-ac86-43a2-b922-6fd4bf338216@s32g2000prj.googlegroups.com> |
Am 01.11.2011 19:15, schrieb David Krauss:
> On Oct 26, 10:20 am, David Blaikie<dblai...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> It seems to me, based on my reading of the FDIS, that there's been a
>> small oversight and that the following example is technically invalid:
>>
>> struct base { };
>> struct derived : ::base { };
>>
>> Given:
>>
>> base-specifier:
>> attribute-specifier-seq[opt] base-type-specifier
>> ...
>>
>> class-or-decltype:
>> nested-name-specifier[opt] class-name
>> decltype-specifier
>
> As of N3242 this was adjusted to
> ::[opt] nested-name-specifier[opt] class-name
... but then came
http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2011/n3259.htm
which tried to solve a similar problem (CWG 355) but seemingly failed to
do that properly. "The intention was good, but..."
>> I've checked through the current defect report lists& nothing seemed
>> to stand out as representing this issue. I hope the description/
>> details are useful/correct/accurate.
>
> Indeed, there doesn't seem to be a DR covering this! I wonder if
> there's a paper trail for this correction. I don't have the FDIS on
> hand so I haven't verified that it was reverted.
I should have responded to the OPs message that I forwarded the problem
description to the core language group (Sometimes I forget to reply).
Greetings from Bremen,
Daniel Krügler
--
[ comp.std.c++ is moderated. To submit articles, try posting with your ]
[ newsreader. If that fails, use mailto:std-cpp-submit@vandevoorde.com ]
[ --- Please see the FAQ before posting. --- ]
[ FAQ: http://www.comeaucomputing.com/csc/faq.html ]
Back to comp.std.c++ | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar
Defect Report: global scope qualified base class specifications David Blaikie<dblaikie@gmail.com> - 2011-10-26 11:20 -0700
Re: Defect Report: global scope qualified base class specifications David Krauss<potswa@gmail.com> - 2011-11-01 11:15 -0700
Re: Defect Report: global scope qualified base class specifications Daniel Krügler <daniel.kruegler@googlemail.com> - 2011-11-02 11:19 -0700
csiph-web