Standard Proposal For New-Style Iterators

Path	csiph.com!eeepc.pasdenom.info!news.pasdenom.info!news.dougwise.org!news-transit.tcx.org.uk!news.tcx.org.uk!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed6.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!news.alt.net
From	Adam Badura <abadura@o2.pl>
Newsgroups	comp.std.c++
Subject	Standard Proposal For New-Style Iterators
Date	Fri, 11 Feb 2011 20:13:44 CST
Organization	http://groups.google.com
Lines	15
Sender	std-cpp-request@vandevoorde.com
Approved	james.dennett@gmail.com
Message-ID	<f672b1d1-d389-47e9-a1cf-d3e9a0a47d54@o7g2000prn.googlegroups.com> (permalink)
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
To	undisclosed-recipients:;
Return-Path	<cppmods@mcgurn.dreamhost.com>
X-Original-Date	Fri, 11 Feb 2011 03:03:20 -0800 (PST)
X-Submission-Address	std-c++-submit@vandevoorde.com
Xref	csiph.com comp.std.c++:664

Show key headers only | View raw

Is the Standard Proposal For New-Style Iterators as mentioned on
Boost.Iterators (http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_45_0/libs/iterator/
doc/new-iter-concepts.html) going to make it to the new standard or
not? Where are formal documents regarding this issue?

Adam Badura


--
[ comp.std.c++ is moderated.  To submit articles, try posting with your ]
[ newsreader.  If that fails, use mailto:std-cpp-submit@vandevoorde.com ]
[              --- Please see the FAQ before posting. ---               ]
[ FAQ: http://www.comeaucomputing.com/csc/faq.html                      ]

Back to comp.std.c++ | Previous | Next | Find similar

Thread

Standard Proposal For New-Style Iterators Adam Badura <abadura@o2.pl> - 2011-02-11 20:13 -0600

csiph-web