Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| Message-ID | <cff819e2-6b6d-4b97-9018-38e6cfde613e@e7g2000vbw.googlegroups.com> (permalink) |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.std.c++ |
| From | Yakov Galka <ybungalobill@gmail.com> |
| Subject | Defect Report: implicitly declared member function, noexcept or throw(), ambiguous. |
| Organization | http://groups.google.com |
| Date | 2011-06-22 01:30 -0600 |
N3290, "15.4 Exception specifications [except.spec], (14)" says:
An implicitly declared special member function (Clause 12) shall have
an exception-specification. If f is
an implicitly declared default constructor, copy constructor, move
constructor, destructor, copy assignment
operator, or move assignment operator, its implicit exception-
specification specifies the type-id T if and only
if T is allowed by the exception-specification of a function directly
invoked by f’s implicit definition; f shall
allow all exceptions if any function it directly invokes allows all
exceptions, and f shall allow no exceptions
if every function it directly invokes allows no exceptions.
If it happens to allow no exceptions, should it be semantically
equivalent to a dynamic-exception-specification and call
std::unexpected, or to noexept(true) and call std::terminate directly?
It does matter in the following case:
struct X { ~X() { throw 0; } };
Here, according to "12.4 Destructors [class.dtor]", the above
paragraph applies. So ~X gets a non-throwing exception-specification.
struct X { ~X() noexcept { throw 0; } };
struct X { ~X() throw() { throw 0; } };
Which one?
--
Yakov Galka
--
[ comp.std.c++ is moderated. To submit articles, try posting with your ]
[ newsreader. If that fails, use mailto:std-cpp-submit@vandevoorde.com ]
[ --- Please see the FAQ before posting. --- ]
[ FAQ: http://www.comeaucomputing.com/csc/faq.html ]
Back to comp.std.c++ | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar
Defect Report: implicitly declared member function, noexcept or throw(), ambiguous. Yakov Galka <ybungalobill@gmail.com> - 2011-06-22 01:30 -0600
Re: Defect Report: implicitly declared member function, noexcept or throw(), ambiguous. Daniel Krügler <daniel.kruegler@googlemail.com> - 2011-06-22 08:22 -0600
Re: Defect Report: implicitly declared member function, noexcept or throw(), ambiguous. Andrzej Krzemieński <akrzemi1@gmail.com> - 2011-06-22 08:23 -0600
Re: Defect Report: implicitly declared member function, noexcept or throw(), ambiguous. Yakov Galka <ybungalobill@gmail.com> - 2011-06-23 13:46 -0600
csiph-web