Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.std.c++ > #258

Re: Pointers to member functions

From "Default User" <defaultuserbr@yahoo.com>
Newsgroups comp.std.c++
Subject Re: Pointers to member functions
Date 2011-08-26 11:19 -0700
Organization unknown
Message-ID <9bpo9kFhgoU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References <9bip7iFevdU1@mid.individual.net> <j365vr$4o8$1@dont-email.me>

Show all headers | View raw


"Daniel Kr=FCgler" <daniel.kruegler@googlemail.com> wrote in message
news:j365vr$4o8$1@dont-email.me...
>
> Am 25.08.2011 02:38, schrieb Default User:
>>  The fine folks over on the other group have pretty much convinced me
>> that
>>  it's undefined behavior.

> It seems to me that the code is well-formed and well-defined. IMO the
> meaning in regard to the pointer-to-member operations is fully described
> by 5.2.9 [expr.static.cast] p9, 5.5 [expr.mptr.oper] p2+4+6 in the C++03
> standard (Only little has been changed for C++11, and nothing which is
> related to your example).

In the interim between the original post and yours, opinion on CLC++ shifte=
d
to your conclusion. Thanks for the second look. I feel confident going
forward with this solution now. It will save a good deal of duplicate code
in the subclasses.



Brian



--
[ comp.std.c++ is moderated.  To submit articles, try posting with your ]
[ newsreader.  If that fails, use mailto:std-cpp-submit@vandevoorde.com ]
[              --- Please see the FAQ before posting. ---               ]
[ FAQ: http://www.comeaucomputing.com/csc/faq.html                      ]

Back to comp.std.c++ | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Find similar


Thread

Pointers to member functions "Default User"<defaultuserbr@yahoo.com> - 2011-08-24 17:38 -0700
  Re: Pointers to member functions Daniel Krügler<daniel.kruegler@googlemail.com> - 2011-08-25 20:51 -0600
    Re: Pointers to member functions "Default User" <defaultuserbr@yahoo.com> - 2011-08-26 11:19 -0700

csiph-web