Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | Jason McKesson <jmckesson@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.std.c++ |
| Subject | Re: Request för std::vector and possibly others: minimal initalization |
| Date | 2012-03-24 19:27 -0700 |
| Organization | http://groups.google.com |
| Message-ID | <21338855.1124.1332555739693.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@pbctp7> (permalink) |
| References | <abf103e0-7005-47b4-9888-af946353a525@v22g2000vby.googlegroups.com> <3008757.1215.1332274822853.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@pbjv6> <4991d0ff-8c66-41d2-a04d-22a6acce6065@s9g2000pba.googlegroups.com> |
On Friday, March 23, 2012 5:11:22 PM UTC-7, Kevin McCarty wrote: > On Mar 21, 11:35 am, Jason McKesson<jmckes...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Monday, March 19, 2012 11:35:35 PM UTC-7, henrikv wrote: > > > Hello group! > > > > > When writing parallel code, I often allocate a vector for results. I > > > allocate the complete vector with a single resize. What I'd like to do > > > is to tell the resize not to initialize the content, since this will > > > be overwritten anyway. I'd figure something like: > [snip] > > > Any thoughts on this? > > > This looks more like an improper use of `std::vector` than anything that should be added to the specification. > > > > All you need to do is use `std::vector::reserve` to allocate as much space as you plan to use. Then use `emplace_back` to construct each addition to the `vector` in-place. > > > There are at least two situations I can think of, where it would be > *very* useful to be able to initialize or resize a vector of PODs such > that the newly allocated elements will have no initialization > performed. (I'm ambivalent as to the exact mechanics Henrik > proposed.) Objects cannot have "no initialization performed" on them. An object either exists (and therefore has been initialized) or it doesn't (and thus isn't an object; it's a block of memory). Since you mentioned PODs (more accurately, trivial types), you seem to be talking about the performance difference between default initialization (ie: contains undefined stuff) and value initialization (ie: zeroed out, more or less). So, at the very least, you would want to call it this: vector<int> ints(42, std::default_init); Personally, it's something so minor that I wouldn't really bother with it. But at the same time, it could be an issue in performance critical code. Of course, you still need to solve this problem: std::vector<decltype(std::default_init)> stuff(42, std::default_init); Which constructor gets called? -- [ comp.std.c++ is moderated. To submit articles, try posting with your ] [ newsreader. If that fails, use mailto:std-cpp-submit@vandevoorde.com ] [ --- Please see the FAQ before posting. --- ] [ FAQ: http://www.comeaucomputing.com/csc/faq.html ]
Back to comp.std.c++ | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Request för std::vector and possibly others: minimal initalization henrikv <henrik.vallgren@stream-space.com> - 2012-03-19 23:35 -0700
Re: Request för std::vector and possibly others: minimal initalization Francis Glassborow<francis.glassborow@btinternet.com> - 2012-03-21 11:35 -0700
Re: Request för std::vector and possibly others: minimal initalization henrikv<henrik.vallgren@stream-space.com> - 2012-03-23 17:09 -0700
Re: Request för std::vector and possibly others: minimal initalization Daniel Krügler <daniel.kruegler@googlemail.com> - 2012-03-24 19:25 -0700
Re: Request för std::vector and possibly others: minimal initalization Francis Glassborow <francis.glassborow@btinternet.com> - 2012-03-24 19:28 -0700
Re: Request för std::vector and possibly others: minimal initalization Jason McKesson<jmckesson@gmail.com> - 2012-03-21 11:35 -0700
Re: Request för std::vector and possibly others: minimal initalization henrikv<henrik.vallgren@stream-space.com> - 2012-03-23 17:10 -0700
Re: Request för std::vector and possibly others: minimal initalization Jason McKesson<jmckesson@gmail.com> - 2012-03-24 17:55 -0700
Re: Request for std::vector and possibly others: mi brangdon@cix.compulink.co.uk (Dave Harris) - 2012-03-24 19:24 -0700
Re: Re: Request för std::vector and possibly others: minimal initalization jgk@panix.com (Joe keane) - 2012-03-27 12:10 -0700
Re: Request för std::vector and possibly others: minimal initalization Kevin McCarty<kmccarty@gmail.com> - 2012-03-23 17:11 -0700
Re: Request för std::vector and possibly others: minimal initalization Miles Bader<miles@gnu.org> - 2012-03-24 17:55 -0700
Re: Request för std::vector and possibly others: minimal initalization henrikv <henrik.vallgren@stream-space.com> - 2012-03-25 23:14 -0700
Re: Request för std::vector and possibly others: minimal initalization Jason McKesson <jmckesson@gmail.com> - 2012-03-24 19:27 -0700
Re: Request för std::vector and possibly others: minimal initalization Pedro Lamarão<pedro.lamarao@gmail.com> - 2012-03-29 12:28 -0700
Re: Request för std::vector and possibly others: minimal initalization Daniel Krügler <daniel.kruegler@googlemail.com> - 2012-03-29 13:17 -0700
csiph-web