Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.std.c++ > #95

Re: Checking C++0X support

Show all headers | View raw

On 2011-04-11 09:28:43 -0400, Helmut Jarausch said:


> for some time, some compilers won't support the (full) C++0X standard.
> For an even longer time, software won't require the usage of such a
> compiler, but also don't want to preclude taking advantage of the new
> features if such a compiler is used.
> So, there is need for a portable compile time check for C++0X support.
> Is there something like this?
>
>
Compilers that conform to the C++0x specification will define the macro
__cplusplus with the value 201103L. Compilers that do not conform to the
C++0x specification are not constrained by the C++0x specification (duh),
but, hopefully, won't do that.

-- 
 Pete
Roundhouse Consulting, Ltd. (www.versatilecoding.com) Author of "The
Standard C++ Library Extensions: a Tutorial and Reference (
www.petebecker.com/tr1book)


[ comp.std.c++ is moderated.  To submit articles, try posting with your ]
[ newsreader.  If that fails, use mailto:std-cpp-submit@vandevoorde.com ]
[              --- Please see the FAQ before posting. ---               ]
[ FAQ: http://www.comeaucomputing.com/csc/faq.html                      ]

Back to comp.std.c++ | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Checking C++0X support Helmut Jarausch <jarausch@igpm.rwth-aachen.de> - 2011-04-11 13:28 -0600
  Re: Checking C++0X support  Pete Becker <pete@versatilecoding.com> - 2011-04-12 13:09 -0600
  Re: Checking C++0X support  =3D?UTF-8?B?RGFuaWVsIEtyw7xnbGVy?=3D <daniel.kruegler@googlemail.com> - 2011-04-12 13:10 -0600
  Re: Checking C++0X support  CornedBee <wasti.redl@gmx.net> - 2011-04-12 13:11 -0600

csiph-web