Re: Is removing necessity of std::move for local variables used for the last time a good proposal?

Path	csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!news.glorb.com!border3.nntp.dca.giganews.com!backlog3.nntp.dca3.giganews.com!Xl.tags.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date	Tue, 17 Jun 2014 07:30:02 -0500
Return-Path	<cppmods@glengoyne.dreamhost.com>
Sender	std-cpp-request@vandevoorde.com
Approved	james.dennett@gmail.com
Message-ID	<07b458f4-01af-49a8-9b4f-9a328e2012a6@googlegroups.com> (permalink)
Newsgroups	comp.std.c++
From	Piotr Nycz <piotrwn1@googlemail.com>
Subject	Re: Is removing necessity of std::move for local variables used for the last time a good proposal?
Organization	unknown
References	<874c0712-4aed-4a8f-991e-b064daa5000f@googlegroups.com> <263da605-5281-469e-86b4-6209739c6133@googlegroups.com> <e57b95aa-61dd-4669-aad5-08354bdec680@googlegroups.com> <lmuonb$ofa$1@dont-email.me>
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Original-Date	Mon, 16 Jun 2014 05:14:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Submission-Address	std-cpp-submit@vandevoorde.com
To	undisclosed-recipients:;
Date	Tue, 17 Jun 2014 07:25:50 CST
Lines	23
X-Usenet-Provider	http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace	sv3-5hMGSZWIWsowLw9MbClM4QCafEtJ6JdeWvBixPYGKZ7kScwdVkDuD2i5yLAXJg+5v072S/V7y/6cb0U!yuzvkGL6F3yrvvoYFBVJ0Wj9AURwh/Bvfz/CKgnwtc4vu55IB0Xa2wY2K+gia17+MYnZB+w7AiJV!9AW65jfY76I=
X-Complaints-To	abuse@giganews.com
X-DMCA-Notifications	http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info	Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info	Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter	1.3.40
X-Original-Bytes	2235
Xref	csiph.com comp.std.c++:725

Show key headers only | View raw

> To write a proposal, please read
>
> https://isocpp.org/std/submit-a-proposal
>
> Given your description, ensure that your proposal addresses the project
>
> "Programming Language C++, Evolution Working Group"
>

I am giving up after reading  Kalle's counterexamples. Maybe when I
find a way to overcome them, then I return to the subject.

Thanks and BR,
Piotr


--
[ comp.std.c++ is moderated.  To submit articles, try posting with your ]
[ newsreader.  If that fails, use mailto:std-cpp-submit@vandevoorde.com ]
[              --- Please see the FAQ before posting. ---               ]
[ FAQ: http://www.comeaucomputing.com/csc/faq.html                      ]

Back to comp.std.c++ | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar

Thread

Is removing necessity of std::move for local variables used for the  last time a good proposal? Piotr Nycz <piotrwn1@googlemail.com> - 2014-05-30 15:32 -0600
  Re: Is removing necessity of std::move for local variables used for  the  last time a good proposal? SG <s.gesemann@googlemail.com> - 2014-06-05 12:31 -0600
    Re: Is removing necessity of std::move for local variables used for  the  last time a good proposal? Kalle Olavi Niemitalo <kon@iki.fi> - 2014-06-07 01:25 -0600
    Re: Is removing necessity of std::move for local variables used for   the  last time a good proposal? Piotr Nycz <piotrwn1@googlemail.com> - 2014-06-07 02:33 -0600
      Re: Is removing necessity of std::move for local variables used for   the  last time a good proposal? Daniel Krügler <daniel.kruegler@googlemail.com> - 2014-06-08 01:32 -0600
        Re: Is removing necessity of std::move for local variables used for    the  last time a good proposal? Piotr Nycz <piotrwn1@googlemail.com> - 2014-06-17 07:25 -0600

csiph-web