Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.soft-sys.matlab > #99297

Re: my take on Kodak downfall

From nospam@nospam.com (Paul Ciszek)
Newsgroups sci.engr.color, sci.image.processing, rec.photo.darkroom, rec.photo.digital, comp.soft-sys.matlab
Subject Re: my take on Kodak downfall
Date 2014-02-10 15:55 +0000
Organization Public Access Networks Corp.
Message-ID <ldaspg$bgt$1@reader1.panix.com> (permalink)
References <796div.pg1.19.1@news.alt.net> <100220140742333463%nospam@nospam.invalid>

Cross-posted to 5 groups.

Show all headers | View raw


In article <100220140742333463%nospam@nospam.invalid>,
nospam  <nospam@nospam.invalid> wrote:
>In article <796div.pg1.19.1@news.alt.net>, Dale
><dale20111942yllek@hushmail.com> wrote:
>
>> having worked there
>> 
>> consumer film was where the big money was
>
>the key is the word *was*.
>
>although kodak pioneered digital photography, they completely failed to
>manage the transition to digital and went bankrupt.

The second mouse gets the cheese.

-- 
"Remember when teachers, public employees, Planned Parenthood, NPR and PBS
crashed the stock market, wiped out half of our 401Ks, took trillions in
TARP money, spilled oil in the Gulf of Mexico, gave themselves billions in
bonuses, and paid no taxes? Yeah, me neither."

Back to comp.soft-sys.matlab | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar


Thread

my take on Kodak downfall Dale <dale20111942yllek@hushmail.com> - 2014-02-10 00:28 -0500
  Re: my take on Kodak downfall "Barry Williams" <barry.r.williamsnospam@saic.com> - 2014-02-10 11:17 +0000
  Re: my take on Kodak downfall nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2014-02-10 07:42 -0500
    Re: my take on Kodak downfall Dale <dale20111942yllek@hushmail.com> - 2014-02-10 07:55 -0500
      Re: my take on Kodak downfall nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2014-02-10 13:36 -0500
    Re: my take on Kodak downfall nospam@nospam.com (Paul Ciszek) - 2014-02-10 15:55 +0000
      Re: my take on Kodak downfall Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2014-02-10 13:53 -0500
  Re: my take on Kodak downfall Bowser <idont@think.so> - 2014-02-10 09:04 -0500
    Re: my take on Kodak downfall Martin Brown <|||newspam|||@nezumi.demon.co.uk> - 2014-02-10 18:13 +0000
      Re: my take on Kodak downfall nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2014-02-10 13:36 -0500
        Re: my take on Kodak downfall Martin Brown <|||newspam|||@nezumi.demon.co.uk> - 2014-02-10 20:59 +0000
          Re: my take on Kodak downfall nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2014-02-10 16:31 -0500
      Re: my take on Kodak downfall Dale <dale20111942yllek@hushmail.com> - 2014-02-10 14:13 -0500
        Re: my take on Kodak downfall nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2014-02-10 14:52 -0500
          Re: my take on Kodak downfall Dale <dale20111942yllek@hushmail.com> - 2014-02-11 08:53 -0500
          Re: my take on Kodak downfall PeterN <peter.newnospam@verizon.net> - 2014-02-13 07:21 -0500
            Re: my take on Kodak downfall nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2014-02-13 17:38 -0500
              Re: my take on Kodak downfall PeterN <peter.newnospam@verizon.net> - 2014-02-13 19:44 -0500
                Re: my take on Kodak downfall nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2014-02-13 20:31 -0500
        Re: my take on Kodak downfall Martin Brown <|||newspam|||@nezumi.demon.co.uk> - 2014-02-10 20:44 +0000
          Re: my take on Kodak downfall "J. Clarke" <jclarkeusenet@cox.net> - 2014-02-10 22:01 -0500
            Re: my take on Kodak downfall Dale <dale20111942yllek@hushmail.com> - 2014-02-11 08:54 -0500
    Re: my take on Kodak downfall nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2014-02-10 13:36 -0500
      Re: my take on Kodak downfall Dale <dale20111942yllek@hushmail.com> - 2014-02-10 17:52 -0500
        Re: my take on Kodak downfall nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2014-02-10 18:20 -0500
          Re: my take on Kodak downfall Dale <dale20111942yllek@hushmail.com> - 2014-02-10 18:56 -0500
            Re: my take on Kodak downfall nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2014-02-10 20:01 -0500
              Re: my take on Kodak downfall Dale <dale20111942yllek@hushmail.com> - 2014-02-11 08:55 -0500
        Re: my take on Kodak downfall Dale <dale20111942yllek@hushmail.com> - 2014-02-10 18:20 -0500
        Re: my take on Kodak downfall Dale <dale20111942yllek@hushmail.com> - 2014-02-10 18:29 -0500
          Re: my take on Kodak downfall nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2014-02-10 20:01 -0500
            Re: my take on Kodak downfall Martin Brown <|||newspam|||@nezumi.demon.co.uk> - 2014-02-11 08:36 +0000
              Re: my take on Kodak downfall nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2014-02-11 11:56 -0500
  Re: my take on Kodak downfall Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2014-02-10 17:00 -0500

csiph-web