Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.soft-sys.matlab > #99321
| From | Dale <dale20111942yllek@hushmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.engr.color, sci.image.processing, rec.photo.darkroom, rec.photo.digital, comp.soft-sys.matlab |
| Subject | Re: my take on Kodak downfall |
| Date | 2014-02-10 14:13 -0500 |
| Organization | Dale |
| Message-ID | <797tu6.phu.19.2@news.alt.net> (permalink) |
| References | <796div.pg1.19.1@news.alt.net> <lumhf9hl9e01rfiemqhvl7n4tptappjcl9@4ax.com> <yF8Ku.13433$s74.7802@fx27.am4> |
Cross-posted to 5 groups.
On 02/10/2014 01:13 PM, Martin Brown wrote: > the raw Bayer array should never be used, an XYZ related array should be used -- Dale
Back to comp.soft-sys.matlab | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
my take on Kodak downfall Dale <dale20111942yllek@hushmail.com> - 2014-02-10 00:28 -0500
Re: my take on Kodak downfall "Barry Williams" <barry.r.williamsnospam@saic.com> - 2014-02-10 11:17 +0000
Re: my take on Kodak downfall nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2014-02-10 07:42 -0500
Re: my take on Kodak downfall Dale <dale20111942yllek@hushmail.com> - 2014-02-10 07:55 -0500
Re: my take on Kodak downfall nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2014-02-10 13:36 -0500
Re: my take on Kodak downfall nospam@nospam.com (Paul Ciszek) - 2014-02-10 15:55 +0000
Re: my take on Kodak downfall Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2014-02-10 13:53 -0500
Re: my take on Kodak downfall Bowser <idont@think.so> - 2014-02-10 09:04 -0500
Re: my take on Kodak downfall Martin Brown <|||newspam|||@nezumi.demon.co.uk> - 2014-02-10 18:13 +0000
Re: my take on Kodak downfall nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2014-02-10 13:36 -0500
Re: my take on Kodak downfall Martin Brown <|||newspam|||@nezumi.demon.co.uk> - 2014-02-10 20:59 +0000
Re: my take on Kodak downfall nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2014-02-10 16:31 -0500
Re: my take on Kodak downfall Dale <dale20111942yllek@hushmail.com> - 2014-02-10 14:13 -0500
Re: my take on Kodak downfall nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2014-02-10 14:52 -0500
Re: my take on Kodak downfall Dale <dale20111942yllek@hushmail.com> - 2014-02-11 08:53 -0500
Re: my take on Kodak downfall PeterN <peter.newnospam@verizon.net> - 2014-02-13 07:21 -0500
Re: my take on Kodak downfall nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2014-02-13 17:38 -0500
Re: my take on Kodak downfall PeterN <peter.newnospam@verizon.net> - 2014-02-13 19:44 -0500
Re: my take on Kodak downfall nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2014-02-13 20:31 -0500
Re: my take on Kodak downfall Martin Brown <|||newspam|||@nezumi.demon.co.uk> - 2014-02-10 20:44 +0000
Re: my take on Kodak downfall "J. Clarke" <jclarkeusenet@cox.net> - 2014-02-10 22:01 -0500
Re: my take on Kodak downfall Dale <dale20111942yllek@hushmail.com> - 2014-02-11 08:54 -0500
Re: my take on Kodak downfall nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2014-02-10 13:36 -0500
Re: my take on Kodak downfall Dale <dale20111942yllek@hushmail.com> - 2014-02-10 17:52 -0500
Re: my take on Kodak downfall nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2014-02-10 18:20 -0500
Re: my take on Kodak downfall Dale <dale20111942yllek@hushmail.com> - 2014-02-10 18:56 -0500
Re: my take on Kodak downfall nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2014-02-10 20:01 -0500
Re: my take on Kodak downfall Dale <dale20111942yllek@hushmail.com> - 2014-02-11 08:55 -0500
Re: my take on Kodak downfall Dale <dale20111942yllek@hushmail.com> - 2014-02-10 18:20 -0500
Re: my take on Kodak downfall Dale <dale20111942yllek@hushmail.com> - 2014-02-10 18:29 -0500
Re: my take on Kodak downfall nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2014-02-10 20:01 -0500
Re: my take on Kodak downfall Martin Brown <|||newspam|||@nezumi.demon.co.uk> - 2014-02-11 08:36 +0000
Re: my take on Kodak downfall nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2014-02-11 11:56 -0500
Re: my take on Kodak downfall Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2014-02-10 17:00 -0500
csiph-web