Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register
Groups > comp.soft-sys.math.mathematica > #16863
| From | Bob Hanlon <hanlonr357@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.soft-sys.math.mathematica |
| Subject | Re: Better way to test the number of arguments? |
| Date | 2014-04-28 01:44 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <ljkbpl$1tb$1@smc.vnet.net> (permalink) |
| References | <20140427064225.DB5346A1C@smc.vnet.net> |
| Organization | Time-Warner Telecom |
CORRECTION
I left off there blank on the function:
ddSaPartial[f_][args__] := D[f[args], {Rest@{args}}]
2014-04-27 8:56 GMT-04:00 Bob Hanlon <hanlonr357@gmail.com>:
> ddSaPartial[f][args__] := D[f[args], {Rest@{args}}]
>
>
>
> Bob Hanlon
>
>
> 2014-04-27 2:42 GMT-04:00 <pgeipi10@gmail.com>:
>
> Hi,
>>
>> I have the following code that produces the gradient of a function (with
>> respect to all but the first variable). There is probably a better way that
>> avoids the Switch.
>>
>> Thank you,
>>
>> Pavel
>>
>> ddSaPartial[func_][t_, s__] := Switch[Length[{s}],
>> 1, {Derivative[0, 1][func][t, s]},
>> 2, {Derivative[0, 1, 0][func][t, s],
>> Derivative[0, 0, 1][func][t, s]},
>> 3, {Derivative[0, 1, 0, 0][func][t, s],
>> Derivative[0, 0, 1, 0][func][t, s],
>> Derivative[0, 0, 0, 1][func][t, s]},
>> 4, {Derivative[0, 1, 0, 0, 0][func][t, s],
>> Derivative[0, 0, 1, 0, 0][func][t, s],
>> Derivative[0, 0, 0, 1, 0][func][t, s],
>> Derivative[0, 0, 0, 0, 1][func][t, s]},
>> 5, {Derivative[0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0][func][t, s],
>> Derivative[0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0][func][t, s],
>> Derivative[0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0][func][t, s],
>> Derivative[0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0][func][t, s],
>> Derivative[0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1][func][t, s]}
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
Back to comp.soft-sys.math.mathematica | Previous | Next | Find similar
Re: Better way to test the number of arguments? Bob Hanlon <hanlonr357@gmail.com> - 2014-04-28 01:44 +0000
csiph-web