Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register


Groups > comp.soft-sys.math.mathematica > #16863

Re: Better way to test the number of arguments?

From Bob Hanlon <hanlonr357@gmail.com>
Newsgroups comp.soft-sys.math.mathematica
Subject Re: Better way to test the number of arguments?
Date 2014-04-28 01:44 +0000
Message-ID <ljkbpl$1tb$1@smc.vnet.net> (permalink)
References <20140427064225.DB5346A1C@smc.vnet.net>
Organization Time-Warner Telecom

Show all headers | View raw


CORRECTION

I left off there blank on the function:

ddSaPartial[f_][args__]  := D[f[args],  {Rest@{args}}]


2014-04-27 8:56 GMT-04:00 Bob Hanlon <hanlonr357@gmail.com>:

> ddSaPartial[f][args__]  := D[f[args],  {Rest@{args}}]
>
>
>
> Bob Hanlon
>
>
> 2014-04-27 2:42 GMT-04:00 <pgeipi10@gmail.com>:
>
> Hi,
>>
>> I have the following code that produces the gradient of a function (with
>> respect to all but the first variable). There is probably a better way that
>> avoids the Switch.
>>
>> Thank you,
>>
>> Pavel
>>
>> ddSaPartial[func_][t_, s__] := Switch[Length[{s}],
>>   1, {Derivative[0, 1][func][t, s]},
>>   2, {Derivative[0, 1, 0][func][t, s],
>>    Derivative[0, 0, 1][func][t, s]},
>>   3, {Derivative[0, 1, 0, 0][func][t, s],
>>    Derivative[0, 0, 1, 0][func][t, s],
>>    Derivative[0, 0, 0, 1][func][t, s]},
>>   4, {Derivative[0, 1, 0, 0, 0][func][t, s],
>>    Derivative[0, 0, 1, 0, 0][func][t, s],
>>    Derivative[0, 0, 0, 1, 0][func][t, s],
>>    Derivative[0, 0, 0, 0, 1][func][t, s]},
>>   5, {Derivative[0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0][func][t, s],
>>    Derivative[0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0][func][t, s],
>>    Derivative[0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0][func][t, s],
>>    Derivative[0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0][func][t, s],
>>    Derivative[0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1][func][t, s]}
>>
>>
>>
>>
>

Back to comp.soft-sys.math.mathematica | Previous | Next | Find similar


Thread

Re: Better way to test the number of arguments? Bob Hanlon <hanlonr357@gmail.com> - 2014-04-28 01:44 +0000

csiph-web