Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.soft-sys.math.mathematica > #16862
| From | Bob Hanlon <hanlonr357@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.soft-sys.math.mathematica |
| Subject | Re: Better way to test the number of arguments? |
| Date | 2014-04-28 01:44 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <ljkbp1$1t1$1@smc.vnet.net> (permalink) |
| References | <20140427064225.DB5346A1C@smc.vnet.net> |
| Organization | Time-Warner Telecom |
ddSaPartial[f][args__] := D[f[args], {Rest@{args}}]
Bob Hanlon
2014-04-27 2:42 GMT-04:00 <pgeipi10@gmail.com>:
> Hi,
>
> I have the following code that produces the gradient of a function (with
> respect to all but the first variable). There is probably a better way that
> avoids the Switch.
>
> Thank you,
>
> Pavel
>
> ddSaPartial[func_][t_, s__] := Switch[Length[{s}],
> 1, {Derivative[0, 1][func][t, s]},
> 2, {Derivative[0, 1, 0][func][t, s],
> Derivative[0, 0, 1][func][t, s]},
> 3, {Derivative[0, 1, 0, 0][func][t, s],
> Derivative[0, 0, 1, 0][func][t, s],
> Derivative[0, 0, 0, 1][func][t, s]},
> 4, {Derivative[0, 1, 0, 0, 0][func][t, s],
> Derivative[0, 0, 1, 0, 0][func][t, s],
> Derivative[0, 0, 0, 1, 0][func][t, s],
> Derivative[0, 0, 0, 0, 1][func][t, s]},
> 5, {Derivative[0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0][func][t, s],
> Derivative[0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0][func][t, s],
> Derivative[0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0][func][t, s],
> Derivative[0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0][func][t, s],
> Derivative[0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1][func][t, s]}
>
>
>
>
Back to comp.soft-sys.math.mathematica | Previous | Next | Find similar
Re: Better way to test the number of arguments? Bob Hanlon <hanlonr357@gmail.com> - 2014-04-28 01:44 +0000
csiph-web