Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.soft-sys.math.mathematica > #16862

Re: Better way to test the number of arguments?

From Bob Hanlon <hanlonr357@gmail.com>
Newsgroups comp.soft-sys.math.mathematica
Subject Re: Better way to test the number of arguments?
Date 2014-04-28 01:44 +0000
Message-ID <ljkbp1$1t1$1@smc.vnet.net> (permalink)
References <20140427064225.DB5346A1C@smc.vnet.net>
Organization Time-Warner Telecom

Show all headers | View raw


ddSaPartial[f][args__]  := D[f[args],  {Rest@{args}}]



Bob Hanlon


2014-04-27 2:42 GMT-04:00 <pgeipi10@gmail.com>:

> Hi,
>
> I have the following code that produces the gradient of a function (with
> respect to all but the first variable). There is probably a better way that
> avoids the Switch.
>
> Thank you,
>
> Pavel
>
> ddSaPartial[func_][t_, s__] := Switch[Length[{s}],
>   1, {Derivative[0, 1][func][t, s]},
>   2, {Derivative[0, 1, 0][func][t, s],
>    Derivative[0, 0, 1][func][t, s]},
>   3, {Derivative[0, 1, 0, 0][func][t, s],
>    Derivative[0, 0, 1, 0][func][t, s],
>    Derivative[0, 0, 0, 1][func][t, s]},
>   4, {Derivative[0, 1, 0, 0, 0][func][t, s],
>    Derivative[0, 0, 1, 0, 0][func][t, s],
>    Derivative[0, 0, 0, 1, 0][func][t, s],
>    Derivative[0, 0, 0, 0, 1][func][t, s]},
>   5, {Derivative[0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0][func][t, s],
>    Derivative[0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0][func][t, s],
>    Derivative[0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0][func][t, s],
>    Derivative[0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0][func][t, s],
>    Derivative[0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1][func][t, s]}
>
>
>
>

Back to comp.soft-sys.math.mathematica | Previous | Next | Find similar


Thread

Re: Better way to test the number of arguments? Bob Hanlon <hanlonr357@gmail.com> - 2014-04-28 01:44 +0000

csiph-web