Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register
Groups > comp.soft-sys.math.mathematica > #16864
| From | Pavel Grinfeld <pgeipi10@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.soft-sys.math.mathematica |
| Subject | Re: Better way to test the number of arguments? |
| Date | 2014-04-28 01:45 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <ljkbrj$1u9$1@smc.vnet.net> (permalink) |
| References | <20140427064225.DB5346A1C@smc.vnet.net> |
| Organization | Time-Warner Telecom |
Thank you, Bob.
There's one difference in the output. If "f" is a vector(or tensor)-valued
function, I would like the new dimension to be first. For example if f is a
4x5 matrix and a function 1+7 variables, I would like the output to be
7x4x5.
How does one accomplish that?
Thanks again,
Pavel
On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 9:04 AM, Bob Hanlon <hanlonr357@gmail.com> wrote:
> CORRECTION
>
> I left off there blank on the function:
>
> ddSaPartial[f_][args__] := D[f[args], {Rest@{args}}]
>
>
> 2014-04-27 8:56 GMT-04:00 Bob Hanlon <hanlonr357@gmail.com>:
>
> ddSaPartial[f][args__] := D[f[args], {Rest@{args}}]
>>
>>
>>
>> Bob Hanlon
>>
>>
>> 2014-04-27 2:42 GMT-04:00 <pgeipi10@gmail.com>:
>>
>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I have the following code that produces the gradient of a function (with
>>> respect to all but the first variable). There is probably a better way that
>>> avoids the Switch.
>>>
>>> Thank you,
>>>
>>> Pavel
>>>
>>> ddSaPartial[func_][t_, s__] := Switch[Length[{s}],
>>> 1, {Derivative[0, 1][func][t, s]},
>>> 2, {Derivative[0, 1, 0][func][t, s],
>>> Derivative[0, 0, 1][func][t, s]},
>>> 3, {Derivative[0, 1, 0, 0][func][t, s],
>>> Derivative[0, 0, 1, 0][func][t, s],
>>> Derivative[0, 0, 0, 1][func][t, s]},
>>> 4, {Derivative[0, 1, 0, 0, 0][func][t, s],
>>> Derivative[0, 0, 1, 0, 0][func][t, s],
>>> Derivative[0, 0, 0, 1, 0][func][t, s],
>>> Derivative[0, 0, 0, 0, 1][func][t, s]},
>>> 5, {Derivative[0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0][func][t, s],
>>> Derivative[0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0][func][t, s],
>>> Derivative[0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0][func][t, s],
>>> Derivative[0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0][func][t, s],
>>> Derivative[0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1][func][t, s]}
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
Back to comp.soft-sys.math.mathematica | Previous | Next | Find similar
Re: Better way to test the number of arguments? Pavel Grinfeld <pgeipi10@gmail.com> - 2014-04-28 01:45 +0000
csiph-web