Groups > comp.soft-sys.math.mathematica > #16532

Re: Result to DEQ with WA versus Step-by-Step Yields

Path	csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!us.feeder.erje.net!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feeder01.blueworldhosting.com!news.glorb.com!newspump.sol.net!posts.news.twtelecom.net!nnrp3.twtelecom.net!not-for-mail
From	Bob Hanlon <hanlonr357@gmail.com>
Newsgroups	comp.soft-sys.math.mathematica
Subject	Re: Result to DEQ with WA versus Step-by-Step Yields
Date	Sat, 8 Feb 2014 08:47:52 +0000 (UTC)
Sender	steve@smc.vnet.net
Approved	Steven M. Christensen <steve@smc.vnet.net>, Moderator
Message-ID	<ld4qvo$74e$1@smc.vnet.net> (permalink)
References	<20140201055416.D6FE16A13@smc.vnet.net>
Lines	23
Organization	Time-Warner Telecom
NNTP-Posting-Date	08 Feb 2014 08:53:18 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host	23f160ed.news.twtelecom.net
X-Trace	DXC=L37JdoO58oUNEg=@eQK2QZC_A=>8kQj6];[h;PUXBgbTHnHVmV3ecQTEFiONJ7[GoV6olaM_joL?V
X-Complaints-To	abuse@twtelecom.net
Xref	csiph.com comp.soft-sys.math.mathematica:16532

Show key headers only | View raw

I refer frequently to the online documentation and experiment when the
results are not what I would initially guess.

Bob Hanlon

On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 8:08 AM, amzoti <amzoti@gmail.com> wrote:

>
> Thanks all!
>
> Bob Hanlon: I see that you reply to many posting with excellent feedback.
>
> I have always wondered (as your posts are different than many in a very
> good way), how did you learn Mathematica so well?
>
> What approach and/or references did you use?
>
> Regards -A
>
>

Back to comp.soft-sys.math.mathematica | Previous | Next | Find similar

Thread

Re: Result to DEQ with WA versus Step-by-Step Yields Bob Hanlon <hanlonr357@gmail.com> - 2014-02-08 08:47 +0000

csiph-web