Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.soft-sys.math.mathematica > #16532
| From | Bob Hanlon <hanlonr357@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.soft-sys.math.mathematica |
| Subject | Re: Result to DEQ with WA versus Step-by-Step Yields |
| Date | 2014-02-08 08:47 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <ld4qvo$74e$1@smc.vnet.net> (permalink) |
| References | <20140201055416.D6FE16A13@smc.vnet.net> |
| Organization | Time-Warner Telecom |
I refer frequently to the online documentation and experiment when the results are not what I would initially guess. Bob Hanlon On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 8:08 AM, amzoti <amzoti@gmail.com> wrote: > > Thanks all! > > Bob Hanlon: I see that you reply to many posting with excellent feedback. > > I have always wondered (as your posts are different than many in a very > good way), how did you learn Mathematica so well? > > What approach and/or references did you use? > > Regards -A > >
Back to comp.soft-sys.math.mathematica | Previous | Next | Find similar
Re: Result to DEQ with WA versus Step-by-Step Yields Bob Hanlon <hanlonr357@gmail.com> - 2014-02-08 08:47 +0000
csiph-web