Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.soft-sys.math.mathematica > #16511

Re: Result to DEQ with WA versus Step-by-Step Yields

Path csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!news.glorb.com!news-out.readnews.com!transit3.readnews.com!newspump.sol.net!posts.news.twtelecom.net!nnrp3.twtelecom.net!not-for-mail
From Bob Hanlon <hanlonr357@gmail.com>
Newsgroups comp.soft-sys.math.mathematica
Subject Re: Result to DEQ with WA versus Step-by-Step Yields
Date Sun, 2 Feb 2014 04:44:33 +0000 (UTC)
Sender steve@smc.vnet.net
Approved Steven M. Christensen <steve@smc.vnet.net>, Moderator
Message-ID <lckifh$1gr$1@smc.vnet.net> (permalink)
References <20140201055416.D6FE16A13@smc.vnet.net>
Lines 43
Organization Time-Warner Telecom
NNTP-Posting-Date 02 Feb 2014 04:49:55 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host f327a4c4.news.twtelecom.net
X-Trace DXC=MMffEoJ<OJi3Y[822][L=nC_A=>8kQj6m;[h;PUXBgbd\BjXfi;a<@iEFiONJ7[Gofl0^<A7V8=P`
X-Complaints-To abuse@twtelecom.net
Xref csiph.com comp.soft-sys.math.mathematica:16511

Show key headers only | View raw


The step-by-step solution provides the result for t >= 0


sol = ((WolframAlpha[
       "v''+10 v'+125 v=250 unitstep(t),v(0)=0,v'(0)=25",
       {{"DifferentialEquationSolution", 1}, "Output"}] //
      ReleaseHold)[[1]]) // ToRules


{v[t] -> ((5/2)*Sin[10*t])/E^(5*t) +
       (((-(5/2))*Sin[10*t])/E^(5*t) +
            ((1/2)*(4*E^(5*t) - 4*Cos[10*t] + 3*Sin[10*t]))/
              E^(5*t))*UnitStep[t]}



Simplify[sol, t >= 0]


{v[t] -> 2 - (2*Cos[10*t])/E^(5*t) +
       ((3/2)*Sin[10*t])/E^(5*t)}



Bob Hanlon


On Sat, Feb 1, 2014 at 12:54 AM, amzoti <amzoti@gmail.com> wrote:

> When you solve this DEW using WA, you get a result.
>
> However, when you click step-by-step, the result is different.
>
> Is this a bug?
>
> v'' + 10 v' + 125 v = 250 unitstep(t), v(0) = 0, v'(0) = 25
>
> Thanks
>
>

Back to comp.soft-sys.math.mathematica | Previous | NextNext in thread | Find similar


Thread

Re: Result to DEQ with WA versus Step-by-Step Yields Bob Hanlon <hanlonr357@gmail.com> - 2014-02-02 04:44 +0000
  Re: Result to DEQ with WA versus Step-by-Step Yields amzoti <amzoti@gmail.com> - 2014-02-07 06:24 +0000

csiph-web