Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.soft-sys.math.mathematica > #16511

Re: Result to DEQ with WA versus Step-by-Step Yields

Show all headers | View raw

The step-by-step solution provides the result for t >= 0


sol = ((WolframAlpha[
       "v''+10 v'+125 v=250 unitstep(t),v(0)=0,v'(0)=25",
       {{"DifferentialEquationSolution", 1}, "Output"}] //
      ReleaseHold)[[1]]) // ToRules


{v[t] -> ((5/2)*Sin[10*t])/E^(5*t) +
       (((-(5/2))*Sin[10*t])/E^(5*t) +
            ((1/2)*(4*E^(5*t) - 4*Cos[10*t] + 3*Sin[10*t]))/
              E^(5*t))*UnitStep[t]}



Simplify[sol, t >= 0]


{v[t] -> 2 - (2*Cos[10*t])/E^(5*t) +
       ((3/2)*Sin[10*t])/E^(5*t)}



Bob Hanlon


On Sat, Feb 1, 2014 at 12:54 AM, amzoti <amzoti@gmail.com> wrote:

> When you solve this DEW using WA, you get a result.
>
> However, when you click step-by-step, the result is different.
>
> Is this a bug?
>
> v'' + 10 v' + 125 v = 250 unitstep(t), v(0) = 0, v'(0) = 25
>
> Thanks
>
>

Back to comp.soft-sys.math.mathematica | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Re: Result to DEQ with WA versus Step-by-Step Yields Bob Hanlon <hanlonr357@gmail.com> - 2014-02-02 04:44 +0000
  Re: Result to DEQ with WA versus Step-by-Step Yields amzoti <amzoti@gmail.com> - 2014-02-07 06:24 +0000

csiph-web