Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.protocols.dns.bind > #15989

Re: Debian/Ubuntu: Why was the service renamed from bind9 to named?

Path csiph.com!news.uzoreto.com!news.etla.org!nntp-feed.chiark.greenend.org.uk!ewrotcd!usenet-its.stanford.edu!usenet.stanford.edu!not-for-mail
From Dennis Clarke <dclarke@blastwave.org>
Newsgroups comp.protocols.dns.bind
Subject Re: Debian/Ubuntu: Why was the service renamed from bind9 to named?
Date Mon, 20 Jul 2020 16:34:07 +0000
Lines 13
Approved bind-users@lists.isc.org
Message-ID <mailman.728.1595262820.942.bind-users@lists.isc.org> (permalink)
References <3E18C1A0C550C44DA156DA5DA8ECCC6AB60D2E7F@NICS-EXCH2.sbg.nic.at> <af8c0315-6128-5df0-0800-a2940ebcdbe7@thelounge.net> <3E18C1A0C550C44DA156DA5DA8ECCC6AB60D2F10@NICS-EXCH2.sbg.nic.at> <2b5f4d05-b1a8-760c-3082-43843ed486fe@thelounge.net> <3E18C1A0C550C44DA156DA5DA8ECCC6AB60D2FA1@NICS-EXCH2.sbg.nic.at> <6091f715-d145-ab3f-d09b-5ec502575873@thelounge.net> <BAE9894B-2918-425F-A956-A83F2DBF0EC0@isc.org> <d72122e9-bb51-7756-0298-4a667a78b346@thelounge.net> <3E18C1A0C550C44DA156DA5DA8ECCC6AB60D30C8@NICS-EXCH2.sbg.nic.at> <5F11E663.1060805@ipinc.net> <4641DBC7-ED26-40E3-9141-AE8A70846027@kreme.com> <CAGrdBBsmX-7Q1=vNxJciuOQSsQgRaRMV=ZyxGdoYFQNj6kVcPQ@mail.gmail.com> <981760bb-80ad-2f05-8a90-b7644724bb61@blastwave.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host lists.isc.org
Mime-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding 7bit
X-Trace usenet.stanford.edu 1595262858 7747 149.20.1.60 (20 Jul 2020 16:34:18 GMT)
X-Complaints-To action@cs.stanford.edu
To bind-users@lists.isc.org
Return-Path <dclarke@blastwave.org>
X-Original-To bind-users@lists.isc.org
Delivered-To bind-users@lists.isc.org
X-Spam-Status No, score=-0.2 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=disabled version=3.4.2
X-oetec-MailScanner-From dclarke@blastwave.org
X-oetec-MailScanner-SpamCheck not spam, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=-1.2, required 6, autolearn=not spam, ALL_TRUSTED -1.00, DKIM_SIGNED 0.10, DKIM_VALID -0.10, DKIM_VALID_AU -0.10, DKIM_VALID_EF -0.10, NICE_REPLY_A -0.00, URIBL_BLOCKED 0.00)
X-oetec-MailScanner Found to be clean
X-oetec-MailScanner-ID 06KGY71d003608
X-oetec-MailScanner-Information Please contact oetec for more information
DKIM-Signature v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=blastwave.org; s=default; t=1595262849; bh=afunyBTq438cIhJ/cdIJDuHeI0+Agb5CtVYuaSDnp98=; h=Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=QRkNp/YtQYBs2YoT6nZ5qfc4YUaldLldl/7QV5BEpqIyPPVvAA2Fda5j4vDnWv9cW r3PRYtlUuQmofo+0uUVLna49yI6f1rXSiP7XMSP0JkJ1vnvcNoiFy3hRkj9mIDQtg0 67Sq8SuDqjuPM87xTJDs87JbSJsOhBP9BlpNprdPXZtFLVuGQGL+ObqsmXolXe6zoU zJhc8in+ElWsD3QHYnKK7URzrTeVy61U8qncXUDVFYQra+c4FAqc/2kS4XBD9ZPaya Wjb7ezJORxvBlwYv7M9MiXnMqpd/lHkdQFhpmZuwqPpl/7PK2SyI7bBG4CH1vrwOGe zfrPh64T83MSA==
User-Agent Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:77.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/77.0
In-Reply-To <CAGrdBBsmX-7Q1=vNxJciuOQSsQgRaRMV=ZyxGdoYFQNj6kVcPQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Language en-US
X-Spam-Checker-Version SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on mx.pao1.isc.org
X-BeenThere bind-users@lists.isc.org
X-Mailman-Version 2.1.29
Precedence list
List-Id BIND Users Mailing List <bind-users.lists.isc.org>
List-Unsubscribe <https://lists.isc.org/mailman/options/bind-users>, <mailto:bind-users-request@lists.isc.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive <https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/bind-users/>
List-Post <mailto:bind-users@lists.isc.org>
List-Help <mailto:bind-users-request@lists.isc.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe <https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users>, <mailto:bind-users-request@lists.isc.org?subject=subscribe>
X-Mailman-Original-Message-ID <981760bb-80ad-2f05-8a90-b7644724bb61@blastwave.org>
X-Mailman-Original-References <3E18C1A0C550C44DA156DA5DA8ECCC6AB60D2E7F@NICS-EXCH2.sbg.nic.at> <af8c0315-6128-5df0-0800-a2940ebcdbe7@thelounge.net> <3E18C1A0C550C44DA156DA5DA8ECCC6AB60D2F10@NICS-EXCH2.sbg.nic.at> <2b5f4d05-b1a8-760c-3082-43843ed486fe@thelounge.net> <3E18C1A0C550C44DA156DA5DA8ECCC6AB60D2FA1@NICS-EXCH2.sbg.nic.at> <6091f715-d145-ab3f-d09b-5ec502575873@thelounge.net> <BAE9894B-2918-425F-A956-A83F2DBF0EC0@isc.org> <d72122e9-bb51-7756-0298-4a667a78b346@thelounge.net> <3E18C1A0C550C44DA156DA5DA8ECCC6AB60D30C8@NICS-EXCH2.sbg.nic.at> <5F11E663.1060805@ipinc.net> <4641DBC7-ED26-40E3-9141-AE8A70846027@kreme.com> <CAGrdBBsmX-7Q1=vNxJciuOQSsQgRaRMV=ZyxGdoYFQNj6kVcPQ@mail.gmail.com>
Xref csiph.com comp.protocols.dns.bind:15989

Show key headers only | View raw


> And for what it's worth, not all systems moved away from "named" to
> "bind9".  I've been running FreeBSD for decades, and I can't remember
> ever calling the service "bind9".

No one ever calls named anything other than named. In a sane world.


-- 
Dennis Clarke
RISC-V/SPARC/PPC/ARM/CISC
UNIX and Linux spoken
GreyBeard and suspenders optional

Back to comp.protocols.dns.bind | Previous | Next | Find similar


Thread

Re: Debian/Ubuntu: Why was the service renamed from bind9 to named? Dennis Clarke <dclarke@blastwave.org> - 2020-07-20 16:34 +0000

csiph-web