Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.protocols.dns.bind > #15989
| From | Dennis Clarke <dclarke@blastwave.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.protocols.dns.bind |
| Subject | Re: Debian/Ubuntu: Why was the service renamed from bind9 to named? |
| Date | 2020-07-20 16:34 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <mailman.728.1595262820.942.bind-users@lists.isc.org> (permalink) |
| References | (8 earlier) <3E18C1A0C550C44DA156DA5DA8ECCC6AB60D30C8@NICS-EXCH2.sbg.nic.at> <5F11E663.1060805@ipinc.net> <4641DBC7-ED26-40E3-9141-AE8A70846027@kreme.com> <CAGrdBBsmX-7Q1=vNxJciuOQSsQgRaRMV=ZyxGdoYFQNj6kVcPQ@mail.gmail.com> <981760bb-80ad-2f05-8a90-b7644724bb61@blastwave.org> |
> And for what it's worth, not all systems moved away from "named" to > "bind9". I've been running FreeBSD for decades, and I can't remember > ever calling the service "bind9". No one ever calls named anything other than named. In a sane world. -- Dennis Clarke RISC-V/SPARC/PPC/ARM/CISC UNIX and Linux spoken GreyBeard and suspenders optional
Back to comp.protocols.dns.bind | Previous | Next | Find similar
Re: Debian/Ubuntu: Why was the service renamed from bind9 to named? Dennis Clarke <dclarke@blastwave.org> - 2020-07-20 16:34 +0000
csiph-web