Groups > comp.protocols.dns.bind > #15987

Re: Debian/Ubuntu: Why was the service renamed from bind9 to named?

From	"@lbutlr" <kremels@kreme.com>
Newsgroups	comp.protocols.dns.bind
Subject	Re: Debian/Ubuntu: Why was the service renamed from bind9 to named?
Date	2020-07-19 05:06 -0600
Message-ID	<mailman.724.1595156753.942.bind-users@lists.isc.org> (permalink)
References	(6 earlier) <BAE9894B-2918-425F-A956-A83F2DBF0EC0@isc.org> <d72122e9-bb51-7756-0298-4a667a78b346@thelounge.net> <3E18C1A0C550C44DA156DA5DA8ECCC6AB60D30C8@NICS-EXCH2.sbg.nic.at> <5F11E663.1060805@ipinc.net> <4641DBC7-ED26-40E3-9141-AE8A70846027@kreme.com>

Show all headers | View raw

On 17 Jul 2020, at 11:56, Ted Mittelstaedt <tedm@ipinc.net> wrote:
> In fact, the ONLY reason that the name "bind9" was ever even coined
> at all was because the changes from bind8 both in the syntax of the
> config file and how the program operated they wanted to boot admins
> in the behind to get them to change their config files.  It should
> have been put to bed as a name a long time ago, or named "bind
> version 9" like every other software program does with their versions.

This. Exactly this.



-- 
"Yessir, Captain Tight Pants."

Back to comp.protocols.dns.bind | Previous | Next | Find similar

Thread

Re: Debian/Ubuntu: Why was the service renamed from bind9 to named? "@lbutlr" <kremels@kreme.com> - 2020-07-19 05:06 -0600

csiph-web