Path: csiph.com!news.uzoreto.com!news.etla.org!nntp-feed.chiark.greenend.org.uk!ewrotcd!usenet-its.stanford.edu!usenet.stanford.edu!not-for-mail From: "@lbutlr" Newsgroups: comp.protocols.dns.bind Subject: Re: Debian/Ubuntu: Why was the service renamed from bind9 to named? Date: Sun, 19 Jul 2020 05:06:21 -0600 Lines: 15 Approved: bind-users@lists.isc.org Message-ID: References: <3E18C1A0C550C44DA156DA5DA8ECCC6AB60D2E7F@NICS-EXCH2.sbg.nic.at> <3E18C1A0C550C44DA156DA5DA8ECCC6AB60D2F10@NICS-EXCH2.sbg.nic.at> <2b5f4d05-b1a8-760c-3082-43843ed486fe@thelounge.net> <3E18C1A0C550C44DA156DA5DA8ECCC6AB60D2FA1@NICS-EXCH2.sbg.nic.at> <6091f715-d145-ab3f-d09b-5ec502575873@thelounge.net> <3E18C1A0C550C44DA156DA5DA8ECCC6AB60D30C8@NICS-EXCH2.sbg.nic.at> <5F11E663.1060805@ipinc.net> <4641DBC7-ED26-40E3-9141-AE8A70846027@kreme.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lists.isc.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: usenet.stanford.edu 1595156791 25856 149.20.1.60 (19 Jul 2020 11:06:31 GMT) X-Complaints-To: action@cs.stanford.edu To: bind-users Return-Path: X-Original-To: bind-users@lists.isc.org Delivered-To: bind-users@lists.isc.org In-Reply-To: <5F11E663.1060805@ipinc.net> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3645.0.6.2.4) X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=disabled version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on mx.pao1.isc.org X-BeenThere: bind-users@lists.isc.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: BIND Users Mailing List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-Mailman-Original-Message-ID: <4641DBC7-ED26-40E3-9141-AE8A70846027@kreme.com> X-Mailman-Original-References: <3E18C1A0C550C44DA156DA5DA8ECCC6AB60D2E7F@NICS-EXCH2.sbg.nic.at> <3E18C1A0C550C44DA156DA5DA8ECCC6AB60D2F10@NICS-EXCH2.sbg.nic.at> <2b5f4d05-b1a8-760c-3082-43843ed486fe@thelounge.net> <3E18C1A0C550C44DA156DA5DA8ECCC6AB60D2FA1@NICS-EXCH2.sbg.nic.at> <6091f715-d145-ab3f-d09b-5ec502575873@thelounge.net> <3E18C1A0C550C44DA156DA5DA8ECCC6AB60D30C8@NICS-EXCH2.sbg.nic.at> <5F11E663.1060805@ipinc.net> Xref: csiph.com comp.protocols.dns.bind:15987 On 17 Jul 2020, at 11:56, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote: > In fact, the ONLY reason that the name "bind9" was ever even coined > at all was because the changes from bind8 both in the syntax of the > config file and how the program operated they wanted to boot admins > in the behind to get them to change their config files. It should > have been put to bed as a name a long time ago, or named "bind > version 9" like every other software program does with their versions. This. Exactly this. -- "Yessir, Captain Tight Pants."