Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.protocols.dns.bind > #15838

Re: BIND Masters and slaves

From Ben Lavender <ben@airnet.org.uk>
Newsgroups comp.protocols.dns.bind
Subject Re: BIND Masters and slaves
Date 2020-06-15 16:09 +0100
Message-ID <mailman.519.1592233728.942.bind-users@lists.isc.org> (permalink)
References <alpine.DEB.2.21.2006141824180.29360@pannier.local> <614285A0-CBD4-41AA-BD84-B0F0C3C24626@versatushpc.com.br> <alpine.DEB.2.20.2006151522390.22139@grey.csi.cam.ac.uk> <3939648a-1781-bce3-8ccf-ab21fb2fa730@airnet.org.uk>

Show all headers | View raw


The terminology is fairly misleading, as in the slave is not doing the 
work on-behalf of or instruction of the the master. But there is ways 
for the master to influence the slaves; such as "allow-transfer".

I don't see the big issue with making a terminology change in this case.

On 15/06/2020 15:38, Tony Finch wrote:
> Vinícius Ferrão via bind-users <bind-users@lists.isc.org> wrote:
>> But the prevalence of terms are still master and slave. And I really
>> hope this thing of changing nomenclatures doesn’t go any further due to
>> political correctness.
> "Political correctness" just means being considerate for other people,
> especially people who do not have many of the advantages we might take for
> granted.
>
> In any case, master/slave is bad terminology because it is actively
> misleading. It suggests that zone transfers to downstream servers are
> under the control of the upstream servers, which is definitely not the
> case. And it suggests a binary categorization of servers which is also
> wrong, because zone transfers often form a multi-level cascade between
> servers that perform several different functions. It's better to talk
> about update servers, signing servers, zone transfer servers, public or
> private or stealth authoritative servers. For zone transfers it's better
> to talk about which servers are upstream and downstream of each other in
> the distribution network.
>
> You should find that your writing is easier to understand, both for
> experts and non-experts, if you don't use the bad old terminology.
>
> Tony.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list
>
> ISC funds the development of this software with paid support subscriptions. Contact us at https://www.isc.org/contact/ for more information.
>
>
> bind-users mailing list
> bind-users@lists.isc.org
> https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users

Back to comp.protocols.dns.bind | Previous | Next | Find similar


Thread

Re: BIND Masters and slaves Ben Lavender <ben@airnet.org.uk> - 2020-06-15 16:09 +0100

csiph-web