Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.protocols.dns.bind > #15838
| From | Ben Lavender <ben@airnet.org.uk> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.protocols.dns.bind |
| Subject | Re: BIND Masters and slaves |
| Date | 2020-06-15 16:09 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <mailman.519.1592233728.942.bind-users@lists.isc.org> (permalink) |
| References | <alpine.DEB.2.21.2006141824180.29360@pannier.local> <614285A0-CBD4-41AA-BD84-B0F0C3C24626@versatushpc.com.br> <alpine.DEB.2.20.2006151522390.22139@grey.csi.cam.ac.uk> <3939648a-1781-bce3-8ccf-ab21fb2fa730@airnet.org.uk> |
The terminology is fairly misleading, as in the slave is not doing the work on-behalf of or instruction of the the master. But there is ways for the master to influence the slaves; such as "allow-transfer". I don't see the big issue with making a terminology change in this case. On 15/06/2020 15:38, Tony Finch wrote: > Vinícius Ferrão via bind-users <bind-users@lists.isc.org> wrote: >> But the prevalence of terms are still master and slave. And I really >> hope this thing of changing nomenclatures doesn’t go any further due to >> political correctness. > "Political correctness" just means being considerate for other people, > especially people who do not have many of the advantages we might take for > granted. > > In any case, master/slave is bad terminology because it is actively > misleading. It suggests that zone transfers to downstream servers are > under the control of the upstream servers, which is definitely not the > case. And it suggests a binary categorization of servers which is also > wrong, because zone transfers often form a multi-level cascade between > servers that perform several different functions. It's better to talk > about update servers, signing servers, zone transfer servers, public or > private or stealth authoritative servers. For zone transfers it's better > to talk about which servers are upstream and downstream of each other in > the distribution network. > > You should find that your writing is easier to understand, both for > experts and non-experts, if you don't use the bad old terminology. > > Tony. > > _______________________________________________ > Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list > > ISC funds the development of this software with paid support subscriptions. Contact us at https://www.isc.org/contact/ for more information. > > > bind-users mailing list > bind-users@lists.isc.org > https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
Back to comp.protocols.dns.bind | Previous | Next | Find similar
Re: BIND Masters and slaves Ben Lavender <ben@airnet.org.uk> - 2020-06-15 16:09 +0100
csiph-web