Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.protocols.dns.bind > #15702
| Path | csiph.com!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!news.etla.org!nntp-feed.chiark.greenend.org.uk!ewrotcd!usenet-its.stanford.edu!usenet.stanford.edu!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | Paul Kosinski <bind@iment.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.protocols.dns.bind |
| Subject | Re: DoH plugin for BIND |
| Date | Sat, 2 May 2020 09:30:32 -0400 |
| Organization | InterMedia Enterprises |
| Lines | 24 |
| Approved | bind-users@lists.isc.org |
| Message-ID | <mailman.325.1588426229.942.bind-users@lists.isc.org> (permalink) |
| References | <85af55bb-1b23-b847-3de9-ffb198bc9fb9@web.de> <20200429074035.GA91269@isc.org> <d08a148f-18f6-1972-1064-2f878b79bee2@nixmagic.com> <alpine.DEB.2.20.2004292100400.16665@grey.csi.cam.ac.uk> <8670427D-C5E5-42E3-AFEB-BA15F74E5F53@kreme.com> <39825fcf-bcd7-f38a-aeae-2fccc8df0be8@nixmagic.com> <002174a6-4025-fad1-afea-0e96f40d2ff0@thelounge.net> <20200502093032.09f4b5cf@ime1.iment.local> |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | lists.isc.org |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=US-ASCII |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 7bit |
| X-Trace | usenet.stanford.edu 1588426242 23491 149.20.1.60 (2 May 2020 13:30:42 GMT) |
| X-Complaints-To | action@cs.stanford.edu |
| To | bind-users@lists.isc.org |
| Return-Path | <bind@iment.com> |
| X-Original-To | bind-users@lists.isc.org |
| Delivered-To | bind-users@lists.isc.org |
| X-IME-Tag | 8a3e8489-f194-cec5-4469-ee7ec6c6c8a2-34-121f6a |
| DKIM-Signature | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=iment.com; h= date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=1704a; bh=0+cASNFJh6fEnZFnwcVqLoUwgUy7x4B0jxTLgoJ9n3s=; b=irkTZn6ZwzfE LUIqfvik2DFwwe7f5Z3+PkWLBtZ//qbXSspjaP6Bed7AjzPiX9gas5YNPgB67A9w 4XSTRjC8F323CjMfLrO4jD5zZ33a2WM8JGSNTol0aPgXp0X+riDSzYWSNLtOQar2 A4H2hZwwBDxceR6CEgH2JSXxcb21NX4= |
| In-Reply-To | <002174a6-4025-fad1-afea-0e96f40d2ff0@thelounge.net> |
| X-Mailer | Claws Mail |
| X-Spam-Status | No, score=-0.2 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=disabled version=3.4.2 |
| X-Spam-Checker-Version | SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on mx.pao1.isc.org |
| X-BeenThere | bind-users@lists.isc.org |
| X-Mailman-Version | 2.1.29 |
| Precedence | list |
| List-Id | BIND Users Mailing List <bind-users.lists.isc.org> |
| List-Unsubscribe | <https://lists.isc.org/mailman/options/bind-users>, <mailto:bind-users-request@lists.isc.org?subject=unsubscribe> |
| List-Archive | <https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/bind-users/> |
| List-Post | <mailto:bind-users@lists.isc.org> |
| List-Help | <mailto:bind-users-request@lists.isc.org?subject=help> |
| List-Subscribe | <https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users>, <mailto:bind-users-request@lists.isc.org?subject=subscribe> |
| X-Mailman-Original-Message-ID | <20200502093032.09f4b5cf@ime1.iment.local> |
| X-Mailman-Original-References | <85af55bb-1b23-b847-3de9-ffb198bc9fb9@web.de> <20200429074035.GA91269@isc.org> <d08a148f-18f6-1972-1064-2f878b79bee2@nixmagic.com> <alpine.DEB.2.20.2004292100400.16665@grey.csi.cam.ac.uk> <8670427D-C5E5-42E3-AFEB-BA15F74E5F53@kreme.com> <39825fcf-bcd7-f38a-aeae-2fccc8df0be8@nixmagic.com> <002174a6-4025-fad1-afea-0e96f40d2ff0@thelounge.net> |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.protocols.dns.bind:15702 |
Show key headers only | View raw
How many ISPs allow traffic on port 25? My impression is that even many (non-enterprise) business customers can't use port 25. On Sat, 2 May 2020 09:28:54 +0200 Reindl Harald <h.reindl@thelounge.net> wrote: > Am 02.05.20 um 09:00 schrieb Michael De Roover: > > That's actually my biggest concern with DoH, ISP blocking. It doesn't > > seem as obvious as it is with DoT, but deep packet inspection (DPI) is > > already a thing. Don't expect an ISP that wants to block DoT to not > > (want to) block DoH either. The crux of the problem at that point is not > > the technology, it is the ISP's incentives. If the ISP wants to block > > DoT for whatever reason, personally I'd consider it.. not exactly fine > > but at least their right to do so. That's their decision to make. > > seriously? > > that seems to be some US attitude, no wonder what happens there with > user attitudes like "but at least their right to do so" > > the ISP by definition has exactly one right: get money for his service > which is described as "route and transfer every package, don't look at > it, don't mangle it, you have no business about the content of my traffic"
Back to comp.protocols.dns.bind | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: DoH plugin for BIND Paul Kosinski <bind@iment.com> - 2020-05-02 09:30 -0400
csiph-web