Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.protocols.dns.bind > #15702 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Paul Kosinski <bind@iment.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2020-05-02 09:30 -0400 |
| Last post | 2020-05-02 09:30 -0400 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to comp.protocols.dns.bind
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: DoH plugin for BIND Paul Kosinski <bind@iment.com> - 2020-05-02 09:30 -0400
| From | Paul Kosinski <bind@iment.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-05-02 09:30 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: DoH plugin for BIND |
| Message-ID | <mailman.325.1588426229.942.bind-users@lists.isc.org> |
How many ISPs allow traffic on port 25? My impression is that even many (non-enterprise) business customers can't use port 25. On Sat, 2 May 2020 09:28:54 +0200 Reindl Harald <h.reindl@thelounge.net> wrote: > Am 02.05.20 um 09:00 schrieb Michael De Roover: > > That's actually my biggest concern with DoH, ISP blocking. It doesn't > > seem as obvious as it is with DoT, but deep packet inspection (DPI) is > > already a thing. Don't expect an ISP that wants to block DoT to not > > (want to) block DoH either. The crux of the problem at that point is not > > the technology, it is the ISP's incentives. If the ISP wants to block > > DoT for whatever reason, personally I'd consider it.. not exactly fine > > but at least their right to do so. That's their decision to make. > > seriously? > > that seems to be some US attitude, no wonder what happens there with > user attitudes like "but at least their right to do so" > > the ISP by definition has exactly one right: get money for his service > which is described as "route and transfer every package, don't look at > it, don't mangle it, you have no business about the content of my traffic"
Back to top | Article view | comp.protocols.dns.bind
csiph-web