Re: 0x0F700000

From	Willem <willem@toad.stack.nl>
Newsgroups	comp.programming
Subject	Re: 0x0F700000
Date	2012-05-07 18:05 +0000
Organization	Stack Usenet News Service
Message-ID	<slrnjqg3nq.1as4.willem@toad.stack.nl> (permalink)
References	<8156901.962.1336398021438.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@ynei5>

Show all headers | View raw

bob wrote:
) Is there something special about the value 0x0F700000 in programming?  I
) vaguely remember that programmers might set their uninitialized stuff to
) that, but I'm not sure.

No, the canonical value for uninitialized is 0xDEADBEEF


SaSW, Willem
-- 
Disclaimer: I am in no way responsible for any of the statements
            made in the above text. For all I know I might be
            drugged or something..
            No I'm not paranoid. You all think I'm paranoid, don't you !
#EOT

Back to comp.programming | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar

Thread

0x0F700000 bob <bob@coolfone.comze.com> - 2012-05-07 06:40 -0700
  Re: 0x0F700000 Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net> - 2012-05-07 10:52 -0700
    Re: 0x0F700000 free@securityaudit.val.newsbank.net (Dick Wesseling) - 2012-05-07 20:54 +0000
      Re: 0x0F700000 Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net> - 2012-05-07 14:08 -0700
        Re: 0x0F700000 Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2012-05-08 00:22 -0500
          Re: 0x0F700000 Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net> - 2012-05-08 11:22 -0700
            Re: 0x0F700000 Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2012-05-08 15:24 -0500
  Re: 0x0F700000 Willem <willem@toad.stack.nl> - 2012-05-07 18:05 +0000

csiph-web