Path: csiph.com!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder3.hal-mli.net!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder1.hal-mli.net!news.stack.nl!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Willem <willem@toad.stack.nl>
Newsgroups: comp.programming
Subject: Re: 0x0F700000
Date: Mon, 7 May 2012 18:05:46 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: Stack Usenet News Service
Lines: 15
Message-ID: <slrnjqg3nq.1as4.willem@toad.stack.nl>
References: <8156901.962.1336398021438.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@ynei5>
NNTP-Posting-Host: toad.stack.nl
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: mud.stack.nl 1336413946 98203 2001:610:1108:5010::135 (7 May 2012 18:05:46 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: abuse@stack.nl
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 7 May 2012 18:05:46 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: slrn/0.9.9p1 (FreeBSD)
Xref: csiph.com comp.programming:1549

bob wrote:
) Is there something special about the value 0x0F700000 in programming?  I
) vaguely remember that programmers might set their uninitialized stuff to
) that, but I'm not sure.

No, the canonical value for uninitialized is 0xDEADBEEF


SaSW, Willem
-- 
Disclaimer: I am in no way responsible for any of the statements
            made in the above text. For all I know I might be
            drugged or something..
            No I'm not paranoid. You all think I'm paranoid, don't you !
#EOT