Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.programming > #1429
| From | "Mark" <mark_cruzNOTFORSPAM@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.programming, comp.unix.programmer |
| Subject | Re: hash function over IP address |
| Date | 2012-04-05 10:43 -0400 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <jlkb2b$d5f$1@speranza.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | <jliber$ocn$1@speranza.aioe.org> <jlir5m$dd8$1@dont-email.me> <jlk3um$pog$1@speranza.aioe.org> <87bon65l7n.fsf@sapphire.mobileactivedefense.com> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
"Rainer Weikusat" <rweikusat@mssgmbh.com> wrote in message
news:87bon65l7n.fsf@sapphire.mobileactivedefense.com...
>> So the search was based on 'struct nhlfe_key'. Now, what I'm trying to
>> add
>> support for multiple next hops, that is I add a linked list in
>> nhlfe_entry:
>> struct nhlfe_entry{ u_int32_t nhlfe_ix; u_char opcode; ... struct
>> list
>> *nhkey_list;}where 'struct list' is struct listnode that embeds 'void
>> *data'
>> pointer to caller'sprivate data, and this is 'struct nhlfe_key'.So I'm
>> trying to find the way to generate key based on multiple elements in the
>> list to store/search nodes in the tree.
>
> The simplest solution would be to concatenate all 'next hops' in
> order to form a key.
Number of next hops is variable, thus anyway it would require to delete the
node and re-insert it back with a new key generated, right? (that's not an
issue though). How would you suggest to concatenate 32-bit long unsigned
integers, in what form -- convert to strings, concatenate and use such
string as a key?
> A better idea would be to build a so-called radix
> search trie based on keys like this.
Unfortunately this isn't feasible at the moment, as it will require lots of
chnages all over the code and likely break the existing functionality.
Mark
Back to comp.programming | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
hash function over IP address "Mark" <mark_cruzNOTFORSPAM@hotmail.com> - 2012-04-04 16:37 -0400
Re: hash function over IP address Barry Margolin <barmar@alum.mit.edu> - 2012-04-04 16:49 -0400
Re: hash function over IP address China Blue Water Navy <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2012-04-04 14:02 -0700
Re: hash function over IP address "Mark" <mark_cruzNOTFORSPAM@hotmail.com> - 2012-04-04 17:21 -0400
Re: hash function over IP address Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net> - 2012-04-04 14:47 -0700
Re: hash function over IP address Ben Pfaff <blp@cs.stanford.edu> - 2012-04-04 14:40 -0700
Re: hash function over IP address Rainer Weikusat <rweikusat@mssgmbh.com> - 2012-04-04 22:52 +0100
Re: hash function over IP address blp@cs.stanford.edu (Ben Pfaff) - 2012-04-04 15:35 -0700
Re: hash function over IP address Rainer Weikusat <rweikusat@mssgmbh.com> - 2012-04-05 12:08 +0100
Re: hash function over IP address blp@cs.stanford.edu (Ben Pfaff) - 2012-04-05 07:42 -0700
Re: hash function over IP address Rainer Weikusat <rweikusat@mssgmbh.com> - 2012-04-05 16:29 +0100
Re: hash function over IP address Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net> - 2012-04-05 10:05 -0700
Re: hash function over IP address Rainer Weikusat <rweikusat@mssgmbh.com> - 2012-04-05 18:12 +0100
Re: hash function over IP address Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net> - 2012-04-05 10:23 -0700
Re: hash function over IP address Rainer Weikusat <rweikusat@mssgmbh.com> - 2012-04-05 18:34 +0100
Re: hash function over IP address Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net> - 2012-04-05 11:11 -0700
Re: hash function over IP address Rainer Weikusat <rweikusat@mssgmbh.com> - 2012-04-05 19:34 +0100
Re: hash function over IP address Rainer Weikusat <rweikusat@mssgmbh.com> - 2012-04-05 19:38 +0100
Re: hash function over IP address Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net> - 2012-04-05 12:18 -0700
Re: hash function over IP address scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2012-04-05 18:45 +0000
Re: hash function over IP address "Mark" <mark_cruzNOTFORSPAM@hotmail.com> - 2012-04-05 15:02 -0400
Re: hash function over IP address Rick Jones <rick.jones2@hp.com> - 2012-04-04 23:18 +0000
Re: hash function over IP address William Ahern <william@wilbur.25thandClement.com> - 2012-04-04 16:57 -0700
Re: hash function over IP address Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> - 2012-04-04 21:05 -0400
Re: hash function over IP address Barry Margolin <barmar@alum.mit.edu> - 2012-04-04 22:52 -0400
Re: hash function over IP address Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> - 2012-04-05 08:46 -0400
Re: hash function over IP address "Mark" <mark_cruzNOTFORSPAM@hotmail.com> - 2012-04-05 08:42 -0400
Re: hash function over IP address Rainer Weikusat <rweikusat@mssgmbh.com> - 2012-04-05 15:04 +0100
Re: hash function over IP address "Mark" <mark_cruzNOTFORSPAM@hotmail.com> - 2012-04-05 10:43 -0400
Re: hash function over IP address Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> - 2012-04-05 22:24 -0400
Re: hash function over IP address Rainer Weikusat <rweikusat@mssgmbh.com> - 2012-04-06 17:13 +0100
Re: hash function over IP address Rainer Weikusat <rweikusat@mssgmbh.com> - 2012-04-06 17:21 +0100
Re: hash function over IP address "Mark" <mark_cruzNOTFORSPAM@hotmail.com> - 2012-04-09 10:04 -0400
Re: hash function over IP address Rainer Weikusat <rweikusat@mssgmbh.com> - 2012-04-09 15:54 +0100
Re: hash function over IP address BGB <cr88192@hotmail.com> - 2012-04-04 20:21 -0700
Re: hash function over IP address Udit Gangwani <uditg22@gmail.com> - 2012-04-05 00:26 -0700
Re: hash function over IP address Rainer Weikusat <rweikusat@mssgmbh.com> - 2012-04-05 12:15 +0100
Re: hash function over IP address Barry Margolin <barmar@alum.mit.edu> - 2012-04-05 07:52 -0400
csiph-web