Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.programming > #1432
| From | Rainer Weikusat <rweikusat@mssgmbh.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.programming, comp.unix.programmer |
| Subject | Re: hash function over IP address |
| Date | 2012-04-05 18:12 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <87sjgi3xxr.fsf@sapphire.mobileactivedefense.com> (permalink) |
| References | (1 earlier) <87hawzyy3z.fsf@blp.benpfaff.org> <87398jw4ep.fsf@sapphire.mobileactivedefense.com> <87d37nyvjw.fsf@blp.benpfaff.org> <87k41uo2ph.fsf@sapphire.mobileactivedefense.com> <ohkfr.43093$_C5.25998@newsfe09.iad> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net> writes: > On 4/5/12 4:08 AM, Rainer Weikusat wrote: >> blp@cs.stanford.edu (Ben Pfaff) writes: >>> Rainer Weikusat<rweikusat@mssgmbh.com> writes: >>> >>>> Ben Pfaff<blp@cs.stanford.edu> writes: >>>>> "Mark"<mark_cruzNOTFORSPAM@hotmail.com> writes: >>>>> >>>>>> I'm trying to find a way create a hash value over multiple IP addresses (I >>>>>> keep a list of IP addresses and its number is variable. The simplest method >>>>>> I've found so far is (obviously not the most effective and collision free): >>>>> >>>>> Why not use one of many available high-quality hash functions? >>>>> Three that come to mind without even going to a search engine: >>>>> Jenkins lookup3, murmurhash, FNV. >>>> >>>> The simple answer is these hash functions are designed to be used for >>>> large, variable length string keys NOT for small, fixed-size >>>> quantities which can be compared with a single machine instruction. >>>> >>>> http://burtleburtle.net/bob/hash/integer.html >>>> http://www.cris.com/~Ttwang/tech/inthash.htm >>> >>> He has a list of multiple IP addresses. A hash function for >>> variable length keys may well be appropriate. >> >> Calculating the hash value must be cheaper than the full comparisons >> which will be needed for a linear search. > Really? How do you hash a string then? Really. If calculating the hash value is more expensive than the comparisons it is supposed to avoid, it obviously buys you nothing.
Back to comp.programming | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
hash function over IP address "Mark" <mark_cruzNOTFORSPAM@hotmail.com> - 2012-04-04 16:37 -0400
Re: hash function over IP address Barry Margolin <barmar@alum.mit.edu> - 2012-04-04 16:49 -0400
Re: hash function over IP address China Blue Water Navy <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2012-04-04 14:02 -0700
Re: hash function over IP address "Mark" <mark_cruzNOTFORSPAM@hotmail.com> - 2012-04-04 17:21 -0400
Re: hash function over IP address Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net> - 2012-04-04 14:47 -0700
Re: hash function over IP address Ben Pfaff <blp@cs.stanford.edu> - 2012-04-04 14:40 -0700
Re: hash function over IP address Rainer Weikusat <rweikusat@mssgmbh.com> - 2012-04-04 22:52 +0100
Re: hash function over IP address blp@cs.stanford.edu (Ben Pfaff) - 2012-04-04 15:35 -0700
Re: hash function over IP address Rainer Weikusat <rweikusat@mssgmbh.com> - 2012-04-05 12:08 +0100
Re: hash function over IP address blp@cs.stanford.edu (Ben Pfaff) - 2012-04-05 07:42 -0700
Re: hash function over IP address Rainer Weikusat <rweikusat@mssgmbh.com> - 2012-04-05 16:29 +0100
Re: hash function over IP address Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net> - 2012-04-05 10:05 -0700
Re: hash function over IP address Rainer Weikusat <rweikusat@mssgmbh.com> - 2012-04-05 18:12 +0100
Re: hash function over IP address Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net> - 2012-04-05 10:23 -0700
Re: hash function over IP address Rainer Weikusat <rweikusat@mssgmbh.com> - 2012-04-05 18:34 +0100
Re: hash function over IP address Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net> - 2012-04-05 11:11 -0700
Re: hash function over IP address Rainer Weikusat <rweikusat@mssgmbh.com> - 2012-04-05 19:34 +0100
Re: hash function over IP address Rainer Weikusat <rweikusat@mssgmbh.com> - 2012-04-05 19:38 +0100
Re: hash function over IP address Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net> - 2012-04-05 12:18 -0700
Re: hash function over IP address scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2012-04-05 18:45 +0000
Re: hash function over IP address "Mark" <mark_cruzNOTFORSPAM@hotmail.com> - 2012-04-05 15:02 -0400
Re: hash function over IP address Rick Jones <rick.jones2@hp.com> - 2012-04-04 23:18 +0000
Re: hash function over IP address William Ahern <william@wilbur.25thandClement.com> - 2012-04-04 16:57 -0700
Re: hash function over IP address Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> - 2012-04-04 21:05 -0400
Re: hash function over IP address Barry Margolin <barmar@alum.mit.edu> - 2012-04-04 22:52 -0400
Re: hash function over IP address Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> - 2012-04-05 08:46 -0400
Re: hash function over IP address "Mark" <mark_cruzNOTFORSPAM@hotmail.com> - 2012-04-05 08:42 -0400
Re: hash function over IP address Rainer Weikusat <rweikusat@mssgmbh.com> - 2012-04-05 15:04 +0100
Re: hash function over IP address "Mark" <mark_cruzNOTFORSPAM@hotmail.com> - 2012-04-05 10:43 -0400
Re: hash function over IP address Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> - 2012-04-05 22:24 -0400
Re: hash function over IP address Rainer Weikusat <rweikusat@mssgmbh.com> - 2012-04-06 17:13 +0100
Re: hash function over IP address Rainer Weikusat <rweikusat@mssgmbh.com> - 2012-04-06 17:21 +0100
Re: hash function over IP address "Mark" <mark_cruzNOTFORSPAM@hotmail.com> - 2012-04-09 10:04 -0400
Re: hash function over IP address Rainer Weikusat <rweikusat@mssgmbh.com> - 2012-04-09 15:54 +0100
Re: hash function over IP address BGB <cr88192@hotmail.com> - 2012-04-04 20:21 -0700
Re: hash function over IP address Udit Gangwani <uditg22@gmail.com> - 2012-04-05 00:26 -0700
Re: hash function over IP address Rainer Weikusat <rweikusat@mssgmbh.com> - 2012-04-05 12:15 +0100
Re: hash function over IP address Barry Margolin <barmar@alum.mit.edu> - 2012-04-05 07:52 -0400
csiph-web