Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register
Groups > comp.programming > #1239
| From | Rui Maciel <rui.maciel@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.programming |
| Subject | Re: Ideas on solving the file transfer problem |
| Date | 2012-01-15 19:42 +0000 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <jeva73$un2$1@speranza.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | <jev1nr$adj$1@speranza.aioe.org> <12rzp30r2r9ib.114yn9ofgduyc.dlg@40tude.net> <jev4la$hav$1@speranza.aioe.org> <1emksjt7f7jg3$.1hry4owlurhcw$.dlg@40tude.net> |
Dmitry A. Kazakov wrote: >> If a user wants to send/receive a file, why is this any relevant? > > He does not want it, he is put in a position when all choices are bad. The > user wants to publish a photo, to modify meeting minutes, to confirm money > transaction etc. It the OS which forces him to send files rather than > perform actions he really wants and needs. I >>>> Is there any relevant method to transfer files on the interent? >>> >>> Specifically to transfer files, depending on the topology of the >>> publishers and subscribers, their coupling, mutual trust, connectivity >>> QoS etc: >>> >>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rsync >>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BitTorrent_%28protocol%29 >>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Network_File_System_%28protocol%29 >> >> Unfortunately, neither of those technologies solves the problem of >> providing a convenient way for user A to transfer a file to user B. > > You didn't describe the setup. If the condition is that none of more or > less advanced file transfer protocols is available, then, well, none of > them is. Read the original post. >> Rsync is employed >> to synchronize files from multiple locations, bittorrent is designed to >> transfer files from multiple servers to multiple clients and NFS is >> employed to provide remote access to a file system. > > All of them were designed to transfer files. Read the original post. >> None of these scenarios are >> applicable to a simple use case of transfering a file between two users, >> such as the one described in the xkcd comic. > > I don't know what a "simple use case" is. Are you presuming that E-mail is > available, but the NFS mount is not? Why? I've explained in the original post why email wasn't an option. Regarding the use of NFS to transfer a file, sending a file to someone though a pre-existing NFS service requires that either one is already available or that one is made available for the single purpose of sending/receiving a single file. If a NFS service is already available then it is provided by a third-party or it implies that an entire file system is exposed to someone just to be able to send them a file. Suffice to say, this method won't do. > What if the user has no computer > at all? No OS installed? etc. You must define the setup. Once you did it, > e.g. Windows 7, no system administrator on either side etc, then the > answer will become obvious. Read the original post. > Returning to the beginning, transferring files always will be complex, > because it is a wrong abstraction. The Internet industry circumvents > files, at least in the user interfaces, you don't see them. Note that this > requires a very complex environment of browsers, plug-ins, applets, > servlets etc. Rendering a simple web page involves a huge amount of work > equivalent to transfer of many files. The user does not see this and does > not care. He gets what he wants. > > This is the ultimative answer to the cartoon. If you need to transfer a > file, get a better environment where you would not need to worry about > files anymore. It became quite clear that you don't know what you are talking about. A file is a data dump. Claiming that dumping data through a network "requires a very complex environment of browsers, plug-ins, applets, servlets etc." is a clear sign that you are oblivious to the issues regarding this. As a side note, it is possible to send a file between two users by using tools such as netcat and telnet, both requiring zero file transfer protocols. One client dumps the data, the other client pipes it to a file. Done. Rui Maciel
Back to comp.programming | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Ideas on solving the file transfer problem Rui Maciel <rui.maciel@gmail.com> - 2012-01-15 17:17 +0000
Re: Ideas on solving the file transfer problem "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de> - 2012-01-15 18:35 +0100
Re: Ideas on solving the file transfer problem Rui Maciel <rui.maciel@gmail.com> - 2012-01-15 18:07 +0000
Re: Ideas on solving the file transfer problem "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de> - 2012-01-15 20:19 +0100
Re: Ideas on solving the file transfer problem Rui Maciel <rui.maciel@gmail.com> - 2012-01-15 19:42 +0000
Re: Ideas on solving the file transfer problem Willem <willem@toad.stack.nl> - 2012-01-15 19:15 +0000
Re: Ideas on solving the file transfer problem Rui Maciel <rui.maciel@gmail.com> - 2012-01-15 20:10 +0000
Re: Ideas on solving the file transfer problem Leif Roar Moldskred <leifm@dimnakorr.com> - 2012-01-18 09:16 -0600
Re: Ideas on solving the file transfer problem Rui Maciel <rui.maciel@gmail.com> - 2012-01-19 16:26 +0000
Re: Ideas on solving the file transfer problem Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2012-01-19 14:59 -0600
Re: Ideas on solving the file transfer problem Rui Maciel <rui.maciel@gmail.com> - 2012-01-19 21:22 +0000
Re: Ideas on solving the file transfer problem Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2012-01-19 15:54 -0600
Re: Ideas on solving the file transfer problem root <NoEMail@home.org> - 2012-01-19 22:20 +0000
Re: Ideas on solving the file transfer problem Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2012-01-19 17:43 -0600
Re: Ideas on solving the file transfer problem Rui Maciel <rui.maciel@gmail.com> - 2012-01-20 04:22 +0000
Re: Ideas on solving the file transfer problem Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2012-01-19 23:43 -0600
Re: Ideas on solving the file transfer problem Rui Maciel <rui.maciel@gmail.com> - 2012-01-20 12:59 +0000
Re: Ideas on solving the file transfer problem Geoff <geoff@invalid.invalid> - 2012-01-20 02:41 -0800
Re: Ideas on solving the file transfer problem Rui Maciel <rui.maciel@gmail.com> - 2012-01-20 12:45 +0000
Re: Ideas on solving the file transfer problem Geoff <geoff@invalid.invalid> - 2012-01-20 15:41 -0800
Re: Ideas on solving the file transfer problem root <NoEMail@home.org> - 2012-01-21 00:18 +0000
Re: Ideas on solving the file transfer problem Geoff <geoff@invalid.invalid> - 2012-01-20 16:41 -0800
Re: Ideas on solving the file transfer problem Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2012-01-20 18:44 -0600
Re: Ideas on solving the file transfer problem Geoff <geoff@invalid.invalid> - 2012-01-20 15:43 -0800
Re: Ideas on solving the file transfer problem Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2012-01-20 18:34 -0600
Re: Ideas on solving the file transfer problem "Chris Uppal" <chris.uppal@metagnostic.REMOVE-THIS.org> - 2012-01-21 10:21 +0000
Re: Ideas on solving the file transfer problem Rui Maciel <rui.maciel@gmail.com> - 2012-01-20 03:59 +0000
Re: Ideas on solving the file transfer problem Rui Maciel <rui.maciel@gmail.com> - 2012-01-20 03:44 +0000
Re: Ideas on solving the file transfer problem Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2012-01-19 23:41 -0600
Re: Ideas on solving the file transfer problem Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2012-01-20 14:07 +1300
Re: Ideas on solving the file transfer problem blp@cs.stanford.edu (Ben Pfaff) - 2012-01-19 18:20 -0800
Re: Ideas on solving the file transfer problem Leif Roar Moldskred <leifm@dimnakorr.com> - 2012-01-19 20:33 -0600
Re: Ideas on solving the file transfer problem Rui Maciel <rui.maciel@gmail.com> - 2012-01-20 04:08 +0000
csiph-web