Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.programming > #1945
| From | malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.programming |
| Subject | Re: repeating something n times |
| Date | 2012-07-14 14:11 -0700 |
| Organization | http://groups.google.com |
| Message-ID | <b73472b3-9e35-45e4-b9cf-ab8366f4e770@googlegroups.com> (permalink) |
| References | <repeat-20120705210751@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de> <jt7jdv$247$1@dont-email.me> |
בתאריך יום שישי, 6 ביולי 2012 21:56:28 UTC+1, מאת Bart:
>
> C is a good example where they seem to like redundancy (so you have to write
> the loop-index 3 times even though it's never used).
>
> When this is put to the C guys, they might say, Oh the compiler will reduce
> it down to the minimum looping instructions needed if the i index is not
> used. (But then, this is the contrary to the usual way a compiler works, ie.
> expressing exactly what is wanted then the compiler fills in whatever
> complicated code is needed. In C, the programmer writes things out the long
> way, and the compiler simplifies it!)
>
That virtually never happens.
Once in a blue moon you might need
/* Islamic divorce */
for(i=0;i<3;i++)
printf("I divorce you\n");
But almost always in C you use the loop index
for(i=0;i<N;i++)
buff[i] = 0;
A lot of languages use this syntax
/* set the whole buffer to zero */
buff[:] = 0;
in this specific case, it makes sense. But what quickly happens is that you need this
buff[low:high] = buff2[low2+1:high2];
and it's hard to see if the logic is correct. Then you rapidly get this nightmare
buff[flags] = buff2[high/2:low];
and it's impossible to work out what is going on without trawling back to see where flags is set.
Back to comp.programming | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Re: repeating something n times "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2012-07-06 21:56 +0100
Re: repeating something n times Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2012-07-06 22:16 +0100
Re: repeating something n times "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2012-07-06 23:18 +0100
Re: repeating something n times malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com - 2012-07-14 14:11 -0700
Re: repeating something n times "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2012-07-14 23:11 +0100
Re: repeating something n times Ike Naar <ike@iceland.freeshell.org> - 2012-07-14 23:37 +0000
Re: repeating something n times "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2012-07-15 01:16 +0100
Re: repeating something n times malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com - 2012-07-14 17:35 -0700
Re: repeating something n times Aaron W. Hsu <arcfide@sacrideo.us> - 2012-07-14 22:23 -0500
Re: repeating something n times Aaron W. Hsu <arcfide@sacrideo.us> - 2012-07-14 22:19 -0500
Re: repeating something n times "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2012-07-15 11:00 +0100
Re: repeating something n times malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com - 2012-07-14 17:44 -0700
Re: repeating something n times Aaron W. Hsu <arcfide@sacrideo.us> - 2012-07-14 22:17 -0500
Re: repeating something n times "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2012-07-15 11:49 +0100
Re: repeating something n times Aaron W. Hsu <arcfide@sacrideo.us> - 2012-07-15 09:53 -0500
Re: repeating something n times Rui Maciel <rui.maciel@gmail.com> - 2012-07-15 12:18 +0100
Re: repeating something n times "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2012-07-15 13:21 +0100
Re: repeating something n times Willem <willem@toad.stack.nl> - 2012-07-15 13:02 +0000
Re: repeating something n times "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2012-07-15 14:36 +0100
Re: repeating something n times Willem <willem@toad.stack.nl> - 2012-07-15 14:18 +0000
Re: repeating something n times "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2012-07-15 15:45 +0100
Re: repeating something n times Willem <willem@toad.stack.nl> - 2012-07-15 16:25 +0000
Re: repeating something n times "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2012-07-15 18:02 +0100
Re: repeating something n times Rui Maciel <rui.maciel@gmail.com> - 2012-07-15 15:10 +0100
Re: repeating something n times "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2012-07-15 16:10 +0100
Re: repeating something n times malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com - 2012-07-15 13:00 -0700
Re: repeating something n times Aaron W. Hsu <arcfide@sacrideo.us> - 2012-07-14 21:55 -0500
Re: repeating something n times "io_x" <a@b.c.invalid> - 2012-07-17 20:47 +0200
Re: repeating something n times "io_x" <a@b.c.invalid> - 2012-07-18 14:19 +0200
Re: repeating something n times Aaron W. Hsu <arcfide@sacrideo.us> - 2012-07-18 12:55 -0500
Re: repeating something n times malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com - 2012-07-18 11:57 -0700
csiph-web