Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.programming > #1977
| From | malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.programming |
| Subject | Re: repeating something n times |
| Date | 2012-07-18 11:57 -0700 |
| Organization | http://groups.google.com |
| Message-ID | <8bda1d22-199a-4be6-8752-6aa82802adf1@googlegroups.com> (permalink) |
| References | (2 earlier) <b73472b3-9e35-45e4-b9cf-ab8366f4e770@googlegroups.com> <XZadncWsL_SNrJ_NnZ2dnUVZ_smdnZ2d@giganews.com> <5005b1c1$0$13270$4fafbaef@reader2.news.tin.it> <5006a84a$0$13274$4fafbaef@reader2.news.tin.it> <W8Wdna_LGvA-ZZvNnZ2dnUVZ_gSdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
בתאריך יום רביעי, 18 ביולי 2012 18:55:47 UTC+1, מאת Aaron W. Hsu: > >> while( (*x++=*y++) !=0 ); > Besides that, these techniques are a nice way of confusing those who > do not understand C, and keeping code succinct for those who do. I bet > there are some style guides in large companies that avoid these things, > though, in favor of making C look more like Java. > Early in the evolution of C it was thought that these highly compressed expressions were the way to go. In fact they're only useful for a few applications, like writing strcpy(). And even there they tend to confuse.
Back to comp.programming | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar
Re: repeating something n times "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2012-07-06 21:56 +0100
Re: repeating something n times Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2012-07-06 22:16 +0100
Re: repeating something n times "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2012-07-06 23:18 +0100
Re: repeating something n times malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com - 2012-07-14 14:11 -0700
Re: repeating something n times "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2012-07-14 23:11 +0100
Re: repeating something n times Ike Naar <ike@iceland.freeshell.org> - 2012-07-14 23:37 +0000
Re: repeating something n times "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2012-07-15 01:16 +0100
Re: repeating something n times malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com - 2012-07-14 17:35 -0700
Re: repeating something n times Aaron W. Hsu <arcfide@sacrideo.us> - 2012-07-14 22:23 -0500
Re: repeating something n times Aaron W. Hsu <arcfide@sacrideo.us> - 2012-07-14 22:19 -0500
Re: repeating something n times "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2012-07-15 11:00 +0100
Re: repeating something n times malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com - 2012-07-14 17:44 -0700
Re: repeating something n times Aaron W. Hsu <arcfide@sacrideo.us> - 2012-07-14 22:17 -0500
Re: repeating something n times "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2012-07-15 11:49 +0100
Re: repeating something n times Aaron W. Hsu <arcfide@sacrideo.us> - 2012-07-15 09:53 -0500
Re: repeating something n times Rui Maciel <rui.maciel@gmail.com> - 2012-07-15 12:18 +0100
Re: repeating something n times "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2012-07-15 13:21 +0100
Re: repeating something n times Willem <willem@toad.stack.nl> - 2012-07-15 13:02 +0000
Re: repeating something n times "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2012-07-15 14:36 +0100
Re: repeating something n times Willem <willem@toad.stack.nl> - 2012-07-15 14:18 +0000
Re: repeating something n times "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2012-07-15 15:45 +0100
Re: repeating something n times Willem <willem@toad.stack.nl> - 2012-07-15 16:25 +0000
Re: repeating something n times "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2012-07-15 18:02 +0100
Re: repeating something n times Rui Maciel <rui.maciel@gmail.com> - 2012-07-15 15:10 +0100
Re: repeating something n times "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2012-07-15 16:10 +0100
Re: repeating something n times malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com - 2012-07-15 13:00 -0700
Re: repeating something n times Aaron W. Hsu <arcfide@sacrideo.us> - 2012-07-14 21:55 -0500
Re: repeating something n times "io_x" <a@b.c.invalid> - 2012-07-17 20:47 +0200
Re: repeating something n times "io_x" <a@b.c.invalid> - 2012-07-18 14:19 +0200
Re: repeating something n times Aaron W. Hsu <arcfide@sacrideo.us> - 2012-07-18 12:55 -0500
Re: repeating something n times malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com - 2012-07-18 11:57 -0700
csiph-web