Re: quantifying bloat

NNTP-Posting-Date	Sat, 05 May 2012 04:11:48 -0500
From	"Chris Uppal" <chris.uppal@metagnostic.REMOVE-THIS.org>
Newsgroups	comp.programming
References	<12217875.401.1335542191031.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@ynjj38> <W5udnasYne_KmQDSnZ2dnUVZ7q2dnZ2d@bt.com> <1222f8a7-5218-4a58-8104-c401d8725213@t23g2000yqd.googlegroups.com>
Subject	Re: quantifying bloat
Date	Sat, 5 May 2012 10:11:47 +0100
X-Priority	3
X-MSMail-Priority	Normal
X-Newsreader	Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5512
X-MimeOLE	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5512
X-RFC2646	Format=Flowed; Original
Message-ID	<atednb4fIblJcznSnZ2dnUVZ7sCdnZ2d@bt.com> (permalink)
Lines	21
X-Usenet-Provider	http://www.giganews.com
X-AuthenticatedUsername	NoAuthUser
X-Trace	sv3-Wl9NFNGSDJSIZZnUv4oB0Ccwnmc5rcSY9lgt7vxCHsjJCMaEupdsARSbqyCYKBAgpXKc/Gyyk8S76ti!+OsSDsrd3H+8liyfxluPbVXyBaC1Iih0RQ2Bycf6I/5+N+aPaO5odo17Xj+cpvhnp9m65RfTwZs=
X-Complaints-To	abuse@btinternet.com
X-DMCA-Complaints-To	abuse@btinternet.com
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info	Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info	Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter	1.3.40
X-Original-Bytes	2112
Path	csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!news.stben.net!border3.nntp.ams.giganews.com!Xl.tags.giganews.com!border1.nntp.ams.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local2.nntp.ams.giganews.com!nntp.bt.com!news.bt.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
Xref	csiph.com comp.programming:1538

Show key headers only | View raw

James Dow Allen wrote:

> Anyway, the article claimed that Natural Language requires a
> *compromise* between information and redundancy:  It's the
> redundancy that keeps the information from appearing to be
> plain noise.

Reminds me a bit of the claims I've seen (sorry, can't remember where, but I've 
seen it more than once), that searching for extra-terrestrial signals is 
pointless because any civilisation advanced enough to send such a signal would 
also know how to compress it to the point where we couldn't tell it apart from 
random noise.

But that can't be true: if there is a possibility of errors in the 
transmission, then there /has/ to be redundancy in the signal.  I don't know 
whether the various searches for ETI are actually looking for checksums, but it 
doesn't seem like a bad idea ;-)

    -- chris

Back to comp.programming | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

quantifying bloat bob <bob@coolfone.comze.com> - 2012-04-27 08:56 -0700
  Re: quantifying bloat hopcode <hopcode@invalid.de> - 2012-04-27 18:16 +0200
    Re: quantifying bloat Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> - 2012-04-29 16:22 +0200
  Re: quantifying bloat "Chris Uppal" <chris.uppal@metagnostic.REMOVE-THIS.org> - 2012-04-29 10:03 +0100
    Re: quantifying bloat "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de> - 2012-04-29 11:36 +0200
      Re: quantifying bloat Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net> - 2012-04-29 15:09 -0700
        Re: quantifying bloat "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de> - 2012-04-30 10:09 +0200
      Re: quantifying bloat "Chris Uppal" <chris.uppal@metagnostic.REMOVE-THIS.org> - 2012-05-01 08:53 +0100
        Re: quantifying bloat "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de> - 2012-05-01 10:52 +0200
          Re: quantifying bloat hopcode <hopcode@invalid.de> - 2012-05-02 04:02 +0200
          Re: quantifying bloat "Chris Uppal" <chris.uppal@metagnostic.REMOVE-THIS.org> - 2012-05-05 10:03 +0100
            Re: quantifying bloat "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de> - 2012-05-05 12:50 +0200
              Re: quantifying bloat hopcode <hopcode@invalid.de> - 2012-05-05 16:23 +0200
                Re: quantifying bloat "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de> - 2012-05-05 17:43 +0200
      Re: quantifying bloat gremnebulin <peterdjones@yahoo.com> - 2012-05-03 09:27 -0700
        Re: quantifying bloat "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de> - 2012-05-03 18:50 +0200
          Re: quantifying bloat Willem <willem@toad.stack.nl> - 2012-05-04 13:52 +0000
            Re: quantifying bloat "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de> - 2012-05-04 16:05 +0200
              Re: quantifying bloat hopcode <hopcode@invalid.de> - 2012-05-04 20:44 +0200
                Re: quantifying bloat Willem <willem@toad.stack.nl> - 2012-05-04 20:32 +0000
                Re: quantifying bloat "Chris Uppal" <chris.uppal@metagnostic.REMOVE-THIS.org> - 2012-05-05 10:16 +0100
    Re: quantifying bloat James Dow Allen <jdallen2000@yahoo.com> - 2012-05-02 02:44 -0700
      Re: quantifying bloat "Chris Uppal" <chris.uppal@metagnostic.REMOVE-THIS.org> - 2012-05-05 10:11 +0100
        Re: quantifying bloat "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de> - 2012-05-05 13:22 +0200
          Re: quantifying bloat hopcode <hopcode@invalid.de> - 2012-05-05 16:27 +0200
  Re: quantifying bloat rossum <rossum48@coldmail.com> - 2012-04-29 11:01 +0100

csiph-web