Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.programming > #1510

Re: quantifying bloat

Path csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!weretis.net!feeder4.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!border3.nntp.ams.giganews.com!Xl.tags.giganews.com!border1.nntp.ams.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local2.nntp.ams.giganews.com!nntp.bt.com!news.bt.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date Sun, 29 Apr 2012 04:05:27 -0500
From "Chris Uppal" <chris.uppal@metagnostic.REMOVE-THIS.org>
Newsgroups comp.programming
References <12217875.401.1335542191031.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@ynjj38>
Subject Re: quantifying bloat
Date Sun, 29 Apr 2012 10:03:46 +0100
X-Priority 3
X-MSMail-Priority Normal
X-Newsreader Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5512
X-RFC2646 Format=Flowed; Original
X-MimeOLE Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5512
Message-ID <W5udnasYne_KmQDSnZ2dnUVZ7q2dnZ2d@bt.com> (permalink)
Lines 27
X-Usenet-Provider http://www.giganews.com
X-AuthenticatedUsername NoAuthUser
X-Trace sv3-InRakxp9fxye8G7nb1huSY7nzTonkHbGHAhnkAJc7staa3nDWmfuFyZWfuURD80OxyfUQ9GnXWT6XGl!jy5DzuB1sNqNyJT+CktvA5VOl6nHYFSbvEOfaOe8OPmKV26EFAPoR5yPRfwqmtWKmT+VwSkkFMA=
X-Complaints-To abuse@btinternet.com
X-DMCA-Complaints-To abuse@btinternet.com
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter 1.3.40
X-Original-Bytes 2058
Xref csiph.com comp.programming:1510

Show key headers only | View raw

bob wrote:

> Has anyone ever tried to apply information theory to source code to
> quantitatively determine if code is bloated or not?

tar -cf - $codebase | gzip -v > /dev/null

;-)


More seriously (though the above certanly isn't entirely silly), it depends on 
what you mean by "bloat".  Wordy/verbose language design?  Verbose API's ? 
Copy-paste redundancy ?  Missing abstractions[*] ? Excess features ?  Dead code 
left unpruned ?  ...

Some of those could be attacked, I think, with information theory.

But note that the closer you get to some kind of infomation theoretic ideal, 
with no "wasted" bandwidth, the nearer you get to the situation where any error 
in transmission results in a /different/, but /still valid/ message.  Not 
something that I'd like in a programming environment.

    -- chris

[*] abstraction can be thought of as a compression technique.

Back to comp.programming | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

quantifying bloat bob <bob@coolfone.comze.com> - 2012-04-27 08:56 -0700
  Re: quantifying bloat hopcode <hopcode@invalid.de> - 2012-04-27 18:16 +0200
    Re: quantifying bloat Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> - 2012-04-29 16:22 +0200
  Re: quantifying bloat "Chris Uppal" <chris.uppal@metagnostic.REMOVE-THIS.org> - 2012-04-29 10:03 +0100
    Re: quantifying bloat "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de> - 2012-04-29 11:36 +0200
      Re: quantifying bloat Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net> - 2012-04-29 15:09 -0700
        Re: quantifying bloat "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de> - 2012-04-30 10:09 +0200
      Re: quantifying bloat "Chris Uppal" <chris.uppal@metagnostic.REMOVE-THIS.org> - 2012-05-01 08:53 +0100
        Re: quantifying bloat "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de> - 2012-05-01 10:52 +0200
          Re: quantifying bloat hopcode <hopcode@invalid.de> - 2012-05-02 04:02 +0200
          Re: quantifying bloat "Chris Uppal" <chris.uppal@metagnostic.REMOVE-THIS.org> - 2012-05-05 10:03 +0100
            Re: quantifying bloat "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de> - 2012-05-05 12:50 +0200
              Re: quantifying bloat hopcode <hopcode@invalid.de> - 2012-05-05 16:23 +0200
                Re: quantifying bloat "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de> - 2012-05-05 17:43 +0200
      Re: quantifying bloat gremnebulin <peterdjones@yahoo.com> - 2012-05-03 09:27 -0700
        Re: quantifying bloat "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de> - 2012-05-03 18:50 +0200
          Re: quantifying bloat Willem <willem@toad.stack.nl> - 2012-05-04 13:52 +0000
            Re: quantifying bloat "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de> - 2012-05-04 16:05 +0200
              Re: quantifying bloat hopcode <hopcode@invalid.de> - 2012-05-04 20:44 +0200
                Re: quantifying bloat Willem <willem@toad.stack.nl> - 2012-05-04 20:32 +0000
                Re: quantifying bloat "Chris Uppal" <chris.uppal@metagnostic.REMOVE-THIS.org> - 2012-05-05 10:16 +0100
    Re: quantifying bloat James Dow Allen <jdallen2000@yahoo.com> - 2012-05-02 02:44 -0700
      Re: quantifying bloat "Chris Uppal" <chris.uppal@metagnostic.REMOVE-THIS.org> - 2012-05-05 10:11 +0100
        Re: quantifying bloat "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de> - 2012-05-05 13:22 +0200
          Re: quantifying bloat hopcode <hopcode@invalid.de> - 2012-05-05 16:27 +0200
  Re: quantifying bloat rossum <rossum48@coldmail.com> - 2012-04-29 11:01 +0100

csiph-web