Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.programming > #217

Re: Is binary a "language"?

Path csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!feeder1.hal-mli.net!weretis.net!feeder4.news.weretis.net!news.musoftware.de!wum.musoftware.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From "Pascal J. Bourguignon" <pjb@informatimago.com>
Newsgroups comp.programming
Subject Re: Is binary a "language"?
Date Tue, 12 Apr 2011 17:00:55 +0200
Organization Informatimago
Lines 18
Message-ID <87lizfcy54.fsf@kuiper.lan.informatimago.com> (permalink)
References <48ecad59-950d-40ff-9fa6-6f107008335a@fu15g2000vbb.googlegroups.com> <imddm2$und$1@speranza.aioe.org> <slrniokhrq.21f1.willem@toad.stack.nl> <cd16012d-31fa-442e-a3b1-7b125ca6c957@a17g2000yqn.googlegroups.com> <87wrizczf3.fsf@kuiper.lan.informatimago.com> <90j6tbFlrfU1@mid.individual.net>
Mime-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace individual.net OgHv9FAHrNe24Q+WByywYQ2pODu3puc7ZwBo2B1nC6vL9kZog/
Cancel-Lock sha1:Mjc2NjI5ZjUzOGEzMmUzZTgwMDVkYzYyMTIyY2I5M2NkZmQxODA5NA== sha1:zBuwGOH0gP+9+R2Z8yQibQN4Iio=
Face iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwAQMAAABtzGvEAAAABlBMVEUAAAD///+l2Z/dAAAA oElEQVR4nK3OsRHCMAwF0O8YQufUNIQRGIAja9CxSA55AxZgFO4coMgYrEDDQZWPIlNAjwq9 033pbOBPtbXuB6PKNBn5gZkhGa86Z4x2wE67O+06WxGD/HCOGR0deY3f9Ijwwt7rNGNf6Oac l/GuZTF1wFGKiYYHKSFAkjIo1b6sCYS1sVmFhhhahKQssRjRT90ITWUk6vvK3RsPGs+M1RuR mV+hO/VvFAAAAABJRU5ErkJggg==
X-Accept-Language fr, es, en
User-Agent Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux)
Xref x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.programming:217

Show key headers only | View raw


"osmium" <r124c4u102@comcast.net> writes:

> "Pascal J. Bourguignon" wrote:
>
>> Decimal computers used electronic tubes with ten states.
>
> Can you provide a reference to such a computer that ever got out of 
> someone's basement?  My guess is that you can not. 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ENIAC

Perhaps you could learn some computing history.  
After all it's less than a hundred years of history, even a lazy bumb
could have some notions.

-- 
__Pascal Bourguignon__                     http://www.informatimago.com/
A bad day in () is better than a good day in {}.

Back to comp.programming | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar


Thread

Re: Is binary a "language"? spinoza1111 <spinoza1111@yahoo.com> - 2011-04-12 05:57 -0700
  Re: Is binary a "language"? "Pascal J. Bourguignon" <pjb@informatimago.com> - 2011-04-12 16:33 +0200
    Re: Is binary a "language"? "osmium" <r124c4u102@comcast.net> - 2011-04-12 09:46 -0500
      Re: Is binary a "language"? "Pascal J. Bourguignon" <pjb@informatimago.com> - 2011-04-12 17:00 +0200
        Re: Is binary a "language"? "osmium" <r124c4u102@comcast.net> - 2011-04-12 10:11 -0500
        Re: Is binary a "language"? spinoza1111 <spinoza1111@yahoo.com> - 2011-04-15 06:07 -0700
          Re: Is binary a "language"? "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2011-04-15 14:40 +0100
            Re: Is binary a "language"? spinoza1111 <spinoza1111@yahoo.com> - 2011-04-16 06:58 -0700
          Re: Is binary a "language"? "Pascal J. Bourguignon" <pjb@informatimago.com> - 2011-04-15 19:23 +0200
            Re: Is binary a "language"? spinoza1111 <spinoza1111@yahoo.com> - 2011-04-16 07:19 -0700
              Re: Is binary a "language"? "Pascal J. Bourguignon" <pjb@informatimago.com> - 2011-04-17 02:30 +0200
        Re: Is binary a "language"? Thad Smith <ThadSmith@acm.org> - 2011-04-24 15:37 -0700
      Re: Is binary a "language"? spinoza1111 <spinoza1111@yahoo.com> - 2011-04-15 06:01 -0700
    Re: Is binary a "language"? spinoza1111 <spinoza1111@yahoo.com> - 2011-04-15 05:40 -0700
      Re: Is binary a "language"? "Pascal J. Bourguignon" <pjb@informatimago.com> - 2011-04-15 19:12 +0200
        Re: Is binary a "language"? spinoza1111 <spinoza1111@yahoo.com> - 2011-04-16 07:15 -0700

csiph-web